Hi, MingSorry that should be nr_requests <= queue_depth.
在 2022/11/26 10:18, Ming Lei 写道:
If you want aggressive merge on sequential IO workload, the queue depth need
to be a bit less, then more requests can be staggered into scheduler queue,
and merge chance is increased.
But if nr_requests >= queue_depth, it seems to me elevator will have no
effect, no request can be merged or sorted by scheduler, right?
If you want good perf on random IO perf, the queue depth needs to
be deep enough to have enough parallelism for saturating SSD internal.
But we don't recognize sequential/random IO pattern, and usually fixed
queue depth is used.
Is it possible to use none elevator and set large queue_depth if nvme is
used in this case?
Thansk,
Kuai
Thanks,
Ming
.
.