Re: [PATCH v3 20/20] iommu: Rename attach_dev to set_dev

[Robin Murphy]

On 2022-11-28 15:00, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 01:41:56PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > On 2022-11-28 06:46, Lu Baolu wrote:
> > > With the retirement of the detach_dev callback, the naming of attach_dev
> > > isn't meaningful anymore. Rename it to set_dev to restore its real
> > > meaning, that is, setting an iommu domain to a device.
> >
> > English grammar alert: this part is confusing, since the usual in-context
> > reading* of "set[ting] X to Y" is going to imply assigning a value of Y to
> > some unique property of X. Given the actual semantic that when we attach the
> > device to the domain, we are setting the (current) domain as a property of
> > the device, I think the most logical and intuitive abbreviation for this
> > method would be set_domain(), where the target device is then clearly
> > implied by the argument (as the target domain was for attach_dev()).
>
> This is the iommu_domain_ops, it seems a bit weird to call it
> set_domain when it is already acting on a domain object.
>
> set_device_domain()
>
> ?

Ah, the iommu_domain_ops split had completely slipped my mind - maybe 
with that additional context, assign_dev() might work well enough to 
maintain the pattern while still being sufficiently different?

Otherwise, set_device_domain() (or just set_dev_domain()) sounds fair to me.

Cheers,
Robin.