Re: (subset) [PATCHv4 00/13] Introduce RK806 Support

[Mark Brown]

On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 22:42:38 +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> The Rockchip RK3588 Evaluation Boards use SPI connected RK806
> PMICs. Downstream this is handled by a new driver, but apart
> from being SPI connected this chip is quite similar to the
> ther Rockchip PMICs (also RK806 is promoted to also support
> I2C). Thus this series instead updates the RK808 driver(s).
> 
> Changelog since PATCHv3:
>  * https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220909175522.179175-1-sebastian.reichel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>  * Dropped removing REGMAP_I2C dependency from RK817 ASoC driver (applied)
>  * Rename MFD_RK808 to MFD_RK8XX to be consistent. It makes sense to do this now,
>    since the patchset touches all the child drivers anyways.
>  * rebase to v6.1-rc1
>  * collected a couple of Acks
>  * update rk806 DT binding according to DT maintainer feedback
>  * add missing pinmux config to the rk806 DT binding
>  * update rk806_spi_bus_write and rk806_spi_bus_read
>  * replaced some constants with sizeof or defines
>  * used capitalized comments
>  * rename regmap_find_closest_bigger to regulator_find_closest_bigger, not sure
>    why I prefixed it with regmap_ in the first place
>  * use rk8xx_is_enabled_wmsk_regmap instead of regulator_is_enabled_regmap for
>    the switching regulators to correctly report the state
>  * reordered the first few patches grouping the MFD patches together
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[02/13] regulator: rk808: reduce 'struct rk808' usage
        commit: 647e57351f8ebc37d8e12cbc0f4bf7471754a0cc
[11/13] regulator: rk808: Use dev_err_probe
        commit: f39f8709c217d82aabbf51d8669731137ce09aea

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark