Re: [PATCH] riscv: Fix NR_CPUS range conditions

[Conor Dooley]

On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 07:35:59PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 03:32:04PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 12:15:56AM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote:
> > > The conditions reference the symbol SBI_V01, which does not exist. The
> > > correct symbol is RISCV_SBI_V01.
> > 
> > Huh, good spot.
> > Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Yeah, huh. It never occurred to me that we don't have some sort of symbol
> referencing checking in kconfig. Or maybe we do and I just don't know how

kismet, but that does the opposite. Randy Dunlap is the only person I
see fiddling with that stuff usually, so perhaps he knows? +CC them
either way.

> to enable it? Anyway, this issue made me wonder how many more dangling
> references we may have. I wrote a script to look for them and found 29,
> including this one. I'm not exactly sure how to report them since they
> touch so many different places. For now, I've opened this kernel BZ
> 
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216748
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Fixes: e623715f3d67 ("RISC-V: Increase range and default value of NR_CPUS")
> > > Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > >  arch/riscv/Kconfig | 6 +++---
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > > index fec54872ab45..acbfe34c6a00 100644
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > > @@ -319,9 +319,9 @@ config SMP
> > >  config NR_CPUS
> > >  	int "Maximum number of CPUs (2-512)"
> > >  	depends on SMP
> > > -	range 2 512 if !SBI_V01
> > > -	range 2 32 if SBI_V01 && 32BIT
> > > -	range 2 64 if SBI_V01 && 64BIT
> > > +	range 2 512 if !RISCV_SBI_V01
> > > +	range 2 32 if RISCV_SBI_V01 && 32BIT
> > > +	range 2 64 if RISCV_SBI_V01 && 64BIT
> 
> And for this patch,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Thanks,
> drew