Re: [PATCH] clk: qcom: rpmh: add support for SM6350 rpmh IPA clock

From: Alex Elder
Date: Mon Nov 28 2022 - 20:54:31 EST


On 11/28/22 7:35 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2022 at 02:00, Alex Elder <elder@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

The IPA core clock is required for SM6350. Define it.

Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
index 0471bab824642..6a5887aae21a4 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
@@ -603,6 +603,7 @@ static const struct clk_rpmh_desc clk_rpmh_sc7280 = {
DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sm6350, ln_bb_clk2, ln_bb_clk2_ao, "lnbclkg2", 4);
DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sm6350, ln_bb_clk3, ln_bb_clk3_ao, "lnbclkg3", 4);
DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_ARC(sm6350, qlink, qlink_ao, "qphy.lvl", 0x1, 4);
+DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_BCM(sm6350, ipa, "IP0");

So you're saying that the above line is unnecessary...

static struct clk_hw *sm6350_rpmh_clocks[] = {
[RPMH_CXO_CLK] = &sc7280_bi_tcxo.hw,
@@ -613,6 +614,7 @@ static struct clk_hw *sm6350_rpmh_clocks[] = {
[RPMH_LN_BB_CLK3_A] = &sm6350_ln_bb_clk3_ao.hw,
[RPMH_QLINK_CLK] = &sm6350_qlink.hw,
[RPMH_QLINK_CLK_A] = &sm6350_qlink_ao.hw,
+ [RPMH_IPA_CLK] = &sm6350_ipa.hw,

...and that this line (above) can instead look like this:

[RPMH_IPA_CLK] = &sdm845_ipa.hw,

Correct?

This can use sdm845_ipa.hw instead of defining new clocks.

Your statement seems to also be true for the [RPMH_IPA_CLK]
entry in sdx55_rpmh_clocks[]. (For the record, the commit
that added that one was authored by me, and I didn't realize
what you have stated here.)

Please confirm, and I'll update.

I'll also send another patch to remove the definition of
sdx55_ipa if Mani is willing to test it for me...

Thank you Dmitry.

-Alex

};

static const struct clk_rpmh_desc clk_rpmh_sm6350 = {
--
2.34.1