Re: [PATCH v1 14/26] net: dsa: microchip: KSZ88x3 fix loopback support

From: Arun.Ramadoss
Date: Tue Nov 29 2022 - 01:42:27 EST


Hi Oleksij,

On Mon, 2022-11-28 at 12:59 +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you
> know the content is safe
>
> With current code loopback is not working and selftest will always
> fail.
> Fix register and bit offsets to make loopback on KSZ88x3 switches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz8795.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++-----
> -
> drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz8795_reg.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz8795.c
> b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz8795.c
> index 208cf4dde397..a6d5de41a754 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz8795.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz8795.c
> @@ -625,8 +625,13 @@ int ksz8_r_phy(struct ksz_device *dev, u16 phy,
> u16 reg, u16 *val)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - if (restart & PORT_PHY_LOOPBACK)
> - data |= BMCR_LOOPBACK;
> + if (ksz_is_ksz88x3(dev)) {
> + if (restart & KSZ8873_PORT_PHY_LOOPBACK)
> + data |= BMCR_LOOPBACK;
> + } else {
> + if (restart & PORT_PHY_LOOPBACK)
> + data |= BMCR_LOOPBACK;
> + }

Can you consider using ksz8795_masks[] and ksz8863_masks[] to check the
loopback. Like if (restart & mask[PHY_LOOPBAK)) to avoid two checks.

> if (ctrl & PORT_FORCE_100_MBIT)
> data |= BMCR_SPEED100;
> if (ksz_is_ksz88x3(dev)) {
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz8795_reg.h
> b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz8795_reg.h
> index 0bdceb534192..08204da7d621 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz8795_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz8795_reg.h
> @@ -262,6 +262,7 @@
> #define PORT_AUTO_MDIX_DISABLE BIT(2)
> #define PORT_FORCE_MDIX BIT(1)
> #define PORT_MAC_LOOPBACK BIT(0)
> +#define KSZ8873_PORT_PHY_LOOPBACK BIT(0)
>
> #define REG_PORT_1_STATUS_2 0x1E
> #define REG_PORT_2_STATUS_2 0x2E
> --
> 2.30.2
>