On Thu, 24 Nov 2022 20:58:50 +0800Yes, Has been tested to be feasible, will change in next version.
Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
print_trace_line may overflow seq_file buffer. If the event is not
consumed, the while loop keeps peeking this event, causing a infinite loop.
Signed-off-by: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/trace/trace.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index a7fe0e115272..55733224fa88 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -6787,7 +6787,27 @@ tracing_read_pipe(struct file *filp, char __user *ubuf,
ret = print_trace_line(iter);
if (ret == TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE) {
- /* don't print partial lines */
+ /*
+ * If one trace_line of the tracer overflows seq_file
+ * buffer, trace_seq_to_user returns -EBUSY.
+ * In this case, we need to consume it, otherwise,
+ * while loop will peek this event next time,
+ * resulting in an infinite loop.
+ */
+ if (trace_seq_has_overflowed(&iter->seq)) {
The only way to get here is if the above is true, and that is not going to
cause the infinite loop. What does is if save_len == 0. In fact, that's
all you need to check for:
if (save_len == 0) {
Should do the trick.