Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: add schema for NXP S32 SoCs

[Andreas Färber]

Hi Chester,

Am 28.11.22 um 06:48 schrieb Chester Lin:
> Add DT schema for the pinctrl driver of NXP S32 SoC family.
>
> Signed-off-by: Larisa Grigore <larisa.grigore@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ghennadi Procopciuc <Ghennadi.Procopciuc@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Andrei Stefanescu <andrei.stefanescu@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Chester Lin <clin@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Remove the "nxp,pins" property since it has been moved into the driver.
> - Add descriptions for reg entries.
> - Refine the compatible name from "nxp,s32g-..." to "nxp,s32g2-...".

Thanks.

> - Fix schema issues and revise the example.
> - Fix the copyright format suggested by NXP.
>
>   .../pinctrl/nxp,s32cc-siul2-pinctrl.yaml      | 125 ++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 125 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/nxp,s32cc-siul2-pinctrl.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/nxp,s32cc-siul2-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/nxp,s32cc-siul2-pinctrl.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..2fc25a9362af
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/nxp,s32cc-siul2-pinctrl.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)

Any reason the code is GPL-2.0-or-later but the schema is GPL-2.0-only?

> +# Copyright 2022 NXP
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pinctrl/nxp,s32cc-siul2-pinctrl.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: NXP S32 Common Chassis SIUL2 iomux controller
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Ghennadi Procopciuc <Ghennadi.Procopciuc@xxxxxxx>
> +  - Chester Lin <clin@xxxxxxxx>
> +
> +description: |
> +  Core driver for the pin controller found on S32 Common Chassis SoC.

SoC family

> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    enum:
> +      - nxp,s32g2-siul2-pinctrl
> +
> +  reg:
> +    description:
> +      A list of MSCR/IMCR register regions to be reserved.
> +      - MSCR (Multiplexed Signal Configuration Register)
> +        An MSCR register can configure the associated pin as either a GPIO pin
> +        or a function output pin depends on the selected signal source.
> +      - IMCR (Input Multiplexed Signal Configuration Register)
> +        An IMCR register can configure the associated pin as function input
> +        pin depends on the selected signal source.

Does this multi-paragraph text not need "description: |" like above?

> +    minItems: 5
> +    items:
> +      - description: MSCR registers group 0 managed by the SIUL2 controller 0
> +      - description: MSCR registers group 1 managed by the SIUL2 controller 1
> +      - description: MSCR registers group 2 managed by the SIUL2 controller 1
> +      - description: IMCR registers group 0 managed by the SIUL2 controller 0
> +      - description: IMCR registers group 1 managed by the SIUL2 controller 1
> +      - description: IMCR registers group 2 managed by the SIUL2 controller 1
> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - reg
> +
> +patternProperties:
> +  '-pins$':
> +    type: object
> +    additionalProperties: false
> +
> +    patternProperties:
> +      '-grp[0-9]$':
> +        type: object
> +        allOf:
> +          - $ref: pinmux-node.yaml#
> +          - $ref: pincfg-node.yaml#
> +        unevaluatedProperties: false
> +        description:
> +          Pinctrl node's client devices specify pin muxes using subnodes,
> +          which in turn use the standard properties.
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +
> +    /* Pins functions (SSS field) */
> +    #define FUNC0  0
> +    #define FUNC1  1
> +    #define FUNC2  2
> +    #define FUNC3  3
> +    #define FUNC4  4
> +    #define FUNC5  5
> +    #define FUNC6  6
> +    #define FUNC7  7
> +
> +    #define S32CC_PINMUX(PIN, FUNC) (((PIN) << 4) | (FUNC))
> +
> +    #define S32CC_SLEW_208MHZ  0
> +    #define S32CC_SLEW_166MHZ  4
> +    #define S32CC_SLEW_150MHZ  5
> +    #define S32CC_SLEW_133MHZ  6
> +    #define S32CC_SLEW_83MHZ   7

I notice that neither this patch nor the following one introduces a 
dt-bindings header for these macros? Is the plan to only have them in 
TF-A sources? Thinking of DT overlays for SoMs, for example.

Regards,
Andreas

> +
> +    pinctrl@4009c240 {
> +        compatible = "nxp,s32g2-siul2-pinctrl";
> +
> +        /*
> +         * There are two SIUL2 controllers in S32G2:
> +         *
> +         *   siul2_0 @ 0x4009c000
> +         *   siul2_1 @ 0x44010000
> +         *
> +         * Every SIUL2 controller has multiple register types, and here
> +         * only MSCR and IMCR registers need to be revealed for kernel
> +         * to configure pinmux. Please note that some indexes are reserved,
> +         * such as MSCR102-MSCR111 in the following reg property.
> +         */
> +
> +              /* MSCR0-MSCR101 registers on siul2_0 */
> +        reg = <0x4009c240 0x198>,
> +              /* MSCR112-MSCR122 registers on siul2_1 */
> +              <0x44010400 0x2c>,
> +              /* MSCR144-MSCR190 registers on siul2_1 */
> +              <0x44010480 0xbc>,
> +              /* IMCR0-IMCR83 registers on siul2_0 */
> +              <0x4009ca40 0x150>,
> +              /* IMCR119-IMCR397 registers on siul2_1 */
> +              <0x44010c1c 0x45c>,
> +              /* IMCR430-IMCR495 registers on siul2_1 */
> +              <0x440110f8 0x108>;
> +
> +        llce-can0-pins {
> +            llce-can0-grp0 {
> +                pinmux = <S32CC_PINMUX(43, FUNC0)>;
> +                input-enable;
> +                slew-rate = <S32CC_SLEW_208MHZ>;
> +            };
> +
> +            llce-can0-grp1 {
> +                pinmux = <S32CC_PINMUX(44, FUNC2)>;
> +                output-enable;
> +                slew-rate = <S32CC_SLEW_208MHZ>;
> +            };
> +        };
> +    };
> +...

--
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Frankenstraße 146, 90461 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew Myers, Andrew McDonald, Boudien Moerman
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg)