Re: [PATCH 1/1] mmc: sdhci: Fixed too many logs being printed during tuning

[Adrian Hunter]

On 21/11/22 05:11, Wenchao Chen wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 11:57 PM Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 18/11/22 11:25, Wenchao Chen wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 12:00 AM Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 11/11/22 10:42, Wenchao Chen wrote:
>>>>> From: Wenchao Chen <wenchao.chen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>
>>>>> During the HS200 tuning process, too many tuning errors are printed in
>>>>> the log.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Wenchao Chen <wenchao.chen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 4 ++++
>>>>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
>>>>> index fef03de85b99..a503b54305eb 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
>>>>> @@ -3401,6 +3401,10 @@ static void sdhci_data_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 intmask)
>>>>>               if (host->pending_reset)
>>>>>                       return;
>>>>>
>>>>> +             command = SDHCI_GET_CMD(sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_COMMAND));
>>>>> +             if (command == MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK || command == MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK_HS200)
>>>>> +                     return;
>>>>
>>>> Normally we wouldn't get here even if a request got an error because
>>>> then we either reset the data circuit which should stop further
>>>> interrupts, or set host->pending_reset.
>>>>
>>>> Can you elaborate on what is going wrong?
>>>>
>>> Hi  adrian
>>> 1. In the process of tuning, not all tuning values are good, some
>>> tuning values may cause errors, and these errors print too many logs.
>>>     Of course, we reset the cmdline or dataline on error.
>>> 2. use host->pending_reset = true
>>> static void __sdhci_finish_mrq(struct sdhci_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
>>> {
>>> ...
>>> if (sdhci_needs_reset(host, mrq))
>>> host->pending_reset = true;
>>> ...
>>> }
>>>
>>> But intmask = 0x00200000
>>> static void sdhci_data_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 intmask)
>>> {
>>> ...
>>> if (!host->data) {
>>> struct mmc_command *data_cmd = host->data_cmd;
>>>
>>> if (data_cmd && (data_cmd->flags & MMC_RSP_BUSY)) {
>>> if (intmask & SDHCI_INT_DATA_TIMEOUT) { //#define
>>> SDHCI_INT_DATA_TIMEOUT 0x00100000
>>> host->data_cmd = NULL;
>>> data_cmd->error = -ETIMEDOUT;
>>> sdhci_err_stats_inc(host, CMD_TIMEOUT);
>>> __sdhci_finish_mrq(host, data_cmd->mrq);//<=
>>> return;
>>> }
>>> if (intmask & SDHCI_INT_DATA_END) {    //#define  SDHCI_INT_DATA_END 0x00000002
>>>
>>> host->data_cmd = NULL;
>>> /*
>>> * Some cards handle busy-end interrupt
>>> * before the command completed, so make
>>> * sure we do things in the proper order.
>>> */
>>> if (host->cmd == data_cmd)
>>> return;
>>>
>>> __sdhci_finish_mrq(host, data_cmd->mrq);//<=
>>> return;
>>> }
>>> }
>>> ...
>>> if (host->pending_reset)
>>> return;
>>>
>>> pr_err("%s: Got data interrupt 0x%08x even though no data operation
>>> was in progress.\n",
>>>        mmc_hostname(host->mmc), (unsigned)intmask);
>>> sdhci_err_stats_inc(host, UNEXPECTED_IRQ);
>>> sdhci_dumpregs(host);
>>>
>>> return;
>>> }
>>> ...
>>> }
>>
>> Not really following that I'm sorry.
>>
>> Are you saying you get a data interrupt after he data circuit is reset?
>>
> 
> No. During the tuning process, sdhci_data_irq does not skip printing
> because the interrupt state is 0x00200000 (DATA CRC ERROR).

Sorry I am still confused.  Which driver is this?  I was assuming
you were using mmc_send_tuning() because the only interrupt enabled
for regular SDHCI tuning is SDHCI_INT_DATA_AVAIL (0x00000020).

So are you saying you are getting status 0x00200000 even though the
mask is 0x00000020 ?

> 
>>>
>>>>> +
>>>>>               pr_err("%s: Got data interrupt 0x%08x even though no data operation was in progress.\n",
>>>>>                      mmc_hostname(host->mmc), (unsigned)intmask);
>>>>>               sdhci_err_stats_inc(host, UNEXPECTED_IRQ);
>>>>
>>