Re: [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: protect the memory in cgroup from being oom killed

[程垲涛 Chengkaitao Cheng]

On 2022/11/30 20:43，“Bagas Sanjaya”<bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 07:33:01PM +0800, Tao pilgrim wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 4:41 PM Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 11/30/22 14:01, chengkaitao wrote:
> > > > From: chengkaitao <pilgrimtao@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > >
> > > Yikes! Another patch from ZTE guys.
> > >
> > > I'm suspicious to patches sent from them due to bad reputation with
> > > kernel development community. First, they sent all patches via
> > > cgel.zte@xxxxxxxxx (listed in Cc) but Greg can't sure these are really
> > > sent from them ([1] & [2]). Then they tried to workaround by sending
> > > from their personal Gmail accounts, again with same response from him
> > > [3]. And finally they sent spoofed emails (as he pointed out in [4]) -
> > > they pretend to send from ZTE domain but actually sent from their
> > > different domain (see raw message and look for X-Google-Original-From:
> > > header.
> >
> > Hi Bagas Sanjaya,
> >
> > I'm not an employee of ZTE, just an ordinary developer. I really don't know
> > all the details about community and ZTE, The reason why I cc cgel.zte@xxxxxxxxx
> > is because the output of the script <get_maintainer.pl> has the
> > address <cgel.zte@xxxxxxxxx>.
> >
> > If there is any error in the format of the email, I will try my best
> > to correct it.
> >
>
> OK, thanks for clarification. At first I thought you were ZTE guys.
> Sorry for inconvenience.
> 
> Now I ask: why do your email seem spoofed (sending from your gmail
> account but there is extra gmail-specific header that makes you like
> "sending" from your corporate email address? Wouldn't it be nice (and
> appropriate) if you can send and receive email with the latter address
> instead?
>
It may be caused by my previous habits.
Thanks for your advice. I'll do it.

Thanks.
-- 
> An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara