Re: [PATCH rcu 14/16] rxrpc: Use call_rcu_hurry() instead of call_rcu()

From: David Howells
Date: Wed Nov 30 2022 - 14:10:13 EST

Next message: Rob Herring: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: qcom,scm: document MSM8226 clocks"
Previous message: Namhyung Kim: "Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] perf build: Use libtraceevent from the system"
In reply to: Paul E. McKenney: "Re: [PATCH rcu 14/16] rxrpc: Use call_rcu_hurry() instead of call_rcu()"
Next in thread: Joel Fernandes: "Re: [PATCH rcu 14/16] rxrpc: Use call_rcu_hurry() instead of call_rcu()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Note that this conflicts with my patch:

rxrpc: Don't hold a ref for connection workqueue
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git/commit/?h=rxrpc-next&id=450b00011290660127c2d76f5c5ed264126eb229

which should render it unnecessary. It's a little ahead of yours in the
net-next queue, if that means anything.

David

Next message: Rob Herring: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: qcom,scm: document MSM8226 clocks"
Previous message: Namhyung Kim: "Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] perf build: Use libtraceevent from the system"
In reply to: Paul E. McKenney: "Re: [PATCH rcu 14/16] rxrpc: Use call_rcu_hurry() instead of call_rcu()"
Next in thread: Joel Fernandes: "Re: [PATCH rcu 14/16] rxrpc: Use call_rcu_hurry() instead of call_rcu()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]