Re: [PATCH -next v2 6/9] blk-iocost: change div64_u64 to DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP in ioc_refresh_params()

From: Tejun Heo
Date: Wed Nov 30 2022 - 15:23:47 EST


On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 09:21:53PM +0800, Li Nan wrote:
> vrate_min is calculated by DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP, but vrate_max is calculated
> by div64_u64. Vrate_min may be 1 greater than vrate_max if the input
> values min and max of cost.qos are equal.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Nan <linan122@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> block/blk-iocost.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-iocost.c b/block/blk-iocost.c
> index f4a754b9d10f..2316ba93e7d6 100644
> --- a/block/blk-iocost.c
> +++ b/block/blk-iocost.c
> @@ -926,7 +926,7 @@ static bool ioc_refresh_params(struct ioc *ioc, bool force)
>
> ioc->vrate_min = DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP((u64)ioc->params.qos[QOS_MIN] *
> VTIME_PER_USEC, MILLION);
> - ioc->vrate_max = div64_u64((u64)ioc->params.qos[QOS_MAX] *
> + ioc->vrate_max = DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP((u64)ioc->params.qos[QOS_MAX] *
> VTIME_PER_USEC, MILLION);

Can you please align the parameters line? Other than that

Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks.

--
tejun