Re: [PATCH v2 01/17] drm/tests: helpers: Move the helper header to include/drm

[Maxime Ripard]

Hi Javier,

On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 09:00:03AM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On 11/28/22 15:53, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > We'll need to use those helpers from drivers too, so let's move it to a
> > more visible location.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_client_modeset_test.c            | 3 +--
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_kunit_helpers.c                  | 3 +--
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_modes_test.c                     | 3 +--
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_probe_helper_test.c              | 3 +--
> >  {drivers/gpu/drm/tests => include/drm}/drm_kunit_helpers.h | 0
> >  5 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_client_modeset_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_client_modeset_test.c
> > index 52929536a158..ed2f62e92fea 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_client_modeset_test.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_client_modeset_test.c
> > @@ -8,12 +8,11 @@
> >  #include <drm/drm_connector.h>
> >  #include <drm/drm_edid.h>
> >  #include <drm/drm_drv.h>
> > +#include <drm/drm_kunit_helpers.h>
> 
> I wonder if now that this header was moved outside of the tests directory,
> if we should add stub functions in the header file that are just defined
> but do nothing if CONFIG_DRM_KUNIT_TEST isn't enabled. So that including
> it in drivers will be a no-op.
> 
> Or do you plan to conditionally include this header file in drivers? So
> that is only included when CONFIG_DRM_KUNIT_TEST is enabled?

I'm not entirely sure. I'd expect only the tests to include it, and thus
would depend on DRM_KUNIT_TEST already. But we can always add the stubs
if it's ever included in a different context.

> Another thing that wondered is if we want a different namespace for this
> header, i.e: <drm/testing/drm_kunit_helpers.h>, to make it clear that is
> not part of the DRM API but just for testing helpers.

If there's a single header, I don't think we need to create the
directory. This is also something we can consolidate later on if needed.

> But these are open questions really, and they can be done as follow-up:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks :)
Maxime

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature