Re: [PATCH V2 09/11] cxl/test: Add generic mock events

[Ira Weiny]

On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 02:37:27PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2022 16:27:17 -0800
> ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> > From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Facilitate testing basic Get/Clear Event functionality by creating
> > multiple logs and generic events with made up UUID's.
> > 
> > Data is completely made up with data patterns which should be easy to
> > spot in trace output.
> > 
> > A single sysfs entry resets the event data and triggers collecting the
> > events for testing.
> > 
> > Events are returned one at a time which is within the specification even
> > though it does not exercise the full capabilities of what a device may
> > do.
> > 
> > Test traces are easy to obtain with a small script such as this:
> > 
> > 	#!/bin/bash -x
> > 
> > 	devices=`find /sys/devices/platform -name cxl_mem*`
> > 
> > 	# Turn on tracing
> > 	echo "" > /sys/kernel/tracing/trace
> > 	echo 1 > /sys/kernel/tracing/events/cxl/enable
> > 	echo 1 > /sys/kernel/tracing/tracing_on
> > 
> > 	# Generate fake interrupt
> > 	for device in $devices; do
> > 	        echo 1 > $device/event_trigger
> > 	done
> > 
> > 	# Turn off tracing and report events
> > 	echo 0 > /sys/kernel/tracing/tracing_on
> > 	cat /sys/kernel/tracing/trace
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> 
> A minor comment on xarray cleanup inline
> 
> Jonathan
> 
> 
> > +void cxl_mock_remove_event_logs(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > +	struct mock_event_store *mes;
> > +
> > +	mes = xa_erase(&mock_dev_event_store, (unsigned long)dev);
> 
> As below, I'd move this into a devm_add_action_or_reset() so
> that we don't need to deal with doing it manually.

yea

> 
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cxl_mock_remove_event_logs);
> 
> ...
> 
> >  static int cxl_mock_mem_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  {
> >  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> >  	struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd;
> >  	struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds;
> > +	u32 ev_status;
> >  	void *lsa;
> >  	int rc;
> >  
> > @@ -281,11 +304,13 @@ static int cxl_mock_mem_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	if (rc)
> >  		return rc;
> >  
> > +	ev_status = cxl_mock_add_event_logs(cxlds);
> 
> On error later in this function these leak.  Just use devm_add_action_or_reset()
> inside cxl_mock_add_event_logs() so we don't have to care about that.

I see it now.  There is an entry in the xarray which is leaked.

> 
> > +
> >  	cxlmd = devm_cxl_add_memdev(cxlds);
> >  	if (IS_ERR(cxlmd))
> >  		return PTR_ERR(cxlmd);
> >  
> > -	cxl_mem_get_event_records(cxlds);
> > +	__cxl_mem_get_event_records(cxlds, ev_status);
> >  
> >  	if (resource_size(&cxlds->pmem_res) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CXL_PMEM))
> >  		rc = devm_cxl_add_nvdimm(dev, cxlmd);
> > @@ -293,6 +318,12 @@ static int cxl_mock_mem_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int cxl_mock_mem_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +	cxl_mock_remove_event_logs(&pdev->dev);
> Why not use devm_add_action_or_reset()?

Yea that is a better pattern.

Ira