[PATCH 4/4] scsi: ufs: ufs-qcom: Use dev_err() where possible

[Andrew Halaney]

dev_err() statements are better to use than pr_err(), so switch to
those.

In a similar vein, the check on the dev_req_params pointer here is
not needed, the two places this function is called never pass in a
NULL pointer, so instead of using dev_err() there just remove it.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c | 8 +-------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
index b1fcff1fad0c..4350c44a6fc7 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
@@ -680,12 +680,6 @@ static int ufs_qcom_pwr_change_notify(struct ufs_hba *hba,
 	struct ufs_dev_params ufs_qcom_cap;
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	if (!dev_req_params) {
-		pr_err("%s: incoming dev_req_params is NULL\n", __func__);
-		ret = -EINVAL;
-		goto out;
-	}
-
 	switch (status) {
 	case PRE_CHANGE:
 		ufshcd_init_pwr_dev_param(&ufs_qcom_cap);
@@ -709,7 +703,7 @@ static int ufs_qcom_pwr_change_notify(struct ufs_hba *hba,
 					       dev_max_params,
 					       dev_req_params);
 		if (ret) {
-			pr_err("%s: failed to determine capabilities\n",
+			dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: failed to determine capabilities\n",
 					__func__);
 			goto out;
 		}
-- 
2.38.1