Re: [PATCH 6.0 000/280] 6.0.11-rc2 review

From: Naresh Kamboju
Date: Fri Dec 02 2022 - 01:37:50 EST


On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 at 18:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.11 release.
> There are 280 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 03 Dec 2022 13:10:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.0.11-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.0.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro's test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx>

## Build
* kernel: 6.0.11-rc2
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-6.0.y
* git commit: 7a60d1d7c4cda7564a42dca46c0a1e358ae4b887
* git describe: v6.0.9-595-g7a60d1d7c4cd
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.0.y/build/v6.0.9-595-g7a60d1d7c4cd

## Test Regressions (compared to v6.0.9)

## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.0.9)

## Test Fixes (compared to v6.0.9)

## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.0.9)

## Test result summary
total: 151978, pass: 129230, fail: 7393, skip: 14991, xfail: 364

## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 147 total, 144 passed, 3 failed
* arm64: 45 total, 45 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 35 total, 34 passed, 1 failed
* mips: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 34 total, 30 passed, 4 failed
* riscv: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 38 total, 38 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-timens
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cv
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simpl
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* ltpa-5904873/0/tests/4_ltp-fsx
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org