Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH net 1/2] octeontx2-pf: Fix possible memory leak in otx2_probe()
From: Geethasowjanya Akula
Date: Fri Dec 02 2022 - 04:51:10 EST
________________________________________
From: Ziyang Xuan (William) <william.xuanziyang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, December 2, 2022 2:04 PM
To: Geethasowjanya Akula; Maciej Fijalkowski; sunil.kovvuri@xxxxxxxxx; Sunil Kovvuri Goutham
Cc: Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta; Hariprasad Kelam; davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx; kuba@xxxxxxxxxx; pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Naveen Mamindlapalli; Rakesh Babu Saladi; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH net 1/2] octeontx2-pf: Fix possible memory leak in otx2_probe()
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Ziyang Xuan (William) <william.xuanziyang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, December 2, 2022 7:14 AM
> To: Maciej Fijalkowski; sunil.kovvuri@xxxxxxxxx; Sunil Kovvuri Goutham
> Cc: Geethasowjanya Akula; Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta; Hariprasad Kelam; davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx; kuba@xxxxxxxxxx; pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Naveen Mamindlapalli; Rakesh Babu Saladi; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH net 1/2] octeontx2-pf: Fix possible memory leak in otx2_probe()
>
> External Email
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 09:56:43AM +0800, Ziyang Xuan wrote:
>>>>>> In otx2_probe(), there are several possible memory leak bugs
>>>>>> in exception paths as follows:
>>>>>> 1. Do not release pf->otx2_wq when excute otx2_init_tc() failed.
>>>>>> 2. Do not shutdown tc when excute otx2_register_dl() failed.
>>>>>> 3. Do not unregister devlink when initialize SR-IOV failed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fixes: 1d4d9e42c240 ("octeontx2-pf: Add tc flower hardware offload on ingress traffic")
>>>>>> Fixes: 2da489432747 ("octeontx2-pf: devlink params support to set mcam entry count")
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_pf.c | 5 ++++-
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_pf.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_pf.c
>>>>>> index 303930499a4c..8d7f2c3b0cfd 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_pf.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_pf.c
>>>>>> @@ -2900,7 +2900,7 @@ static int otx2_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> err = otx2_register_dl(pf);
>>>>>> if (err)
>>>>>> - goto err_mcam_flow_del;
>>>>>> + goto err_register_dl;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /* Initialize SR-IOV resources */
>>>>>> err = otx2_sriov_vfcfg_init(pf);
>>>>>> @@ -2919,8 +2919,11 @@ static int otx2_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
>>>>>> return 0;
>>>>>
>>>>> If otx2_dcbnl_set_ops() fails at the end then shouldn't we also call
>>>>> otx2_sriov_vfcfg_cleanup() ?
>>>>
>>>> I think it does not need. This is the probe process. PF and VF are all not ready to work,
>>>> so pf->vf_configs[i].link_event_work does not scheduled. And pf->vf_configs memory resource will
>>>> be freed by devm subsystem if probe failed. There are not memory leak and other problems.
>>>>
>>> Hello Sunil Goutham, Maciej Fijalkowski,
>>
>>> What do you think about my analysis? Look forward to your >>reply.
>> otx2_sriov_vfcfg_cleanup() is not required. Since PF probe is failed, link event won't get triggered.
>>
>Hello Geetha,
>If there is not any other question, can you add "Reviewed-by" >for my patchset?
>Thank you!
>> Thanks,
>> Geetha.
>> Thank you!
>>
>>>> @Sunil Goutham, Please help to confirm.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> err_pf_sriov_init:
>>>>> + otx2_unregister_dl(pf);
>>>>> +err_register_dl:
>>>>> otx2_shutdown_tc(pf);
>>>>> err_mcam_flow_del:
>>>>> + destroy_workqueue(pf->otx2_wq);
>>>>> otx2_mcam_flow_del(pf);
>>>>> err_unreg_netdev:
>>>>> unregister_netdev(netdev);
>>>>> --
>>>>> 2.25.1
>>>>>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>> .
>>>
> .
>
Reviewed-by: Geethasowjanya<gakula@xxxxxxxxxxx>