Re: [PATCH] net: microchip: sparx5: Fix missing destroy_workqueue of mact_queue

From: Qiheng Lin
Date: Fri Dec 02 2022 - 05:35:40 EST


在 2022/12/2 18:02, Pavan Chebbi 写道:
On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 1:36 PM Pavan Chebbi <pavan.chebbi@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 6:57 PM Qiheng Lin <linqiheng@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The mchp_sparx5_probe() won't destroy workqueue created by
create_singlethread_workqueue() in sparx5_start() when later
inits failed. Add destroy_workqueue in the cleanup_ports case,
also add it in mchp_sparx5_remove()

Signed-off-by: Qiheng Lin <linqiheng@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.c
index eeac04b84638..b6bbb3c9bd7a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.c
@@ -887,6 +887,8 @@ static int mchp_sparx5_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

cleanup_ports:
sparx5_cleanup_ports(sparx5);
+ if (sparx5->mact_queue)
+ destroy_workqueue(sparx5->mact_queue);

Would be better if you destroy inside sparx5_start() before returning failure.


Alternatively you could add the destroy inside sparx5_cleanup_ports()
that will cover all error exits?

That works functionally, I have considered this modification as well. Since I'm not quite sure on the naming, destroying the mact_queue belongs to sparx5_cleanup_ports, which they don't contain now.


cleanup_config:
kfree(configs);
cleanup_pnode:
@@ -911,6 +913,7 @@ static int mchp_sparx5_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
sparx5_cleanup_ports(sparx5);
/* Unregister netdevs */
sparx5_unregister_notifier_blocks(sparx5);
+ destroy_workqueue(sparx5->mact_queue);

return 0;
}
--
2.32.0