Re: [PATCH 1/4] container_of: add container_of_const() that preserves const-ness of the pointer
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Fri Dec 02 2022 - 05:46:10 EST
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 11:21:50PM +0000, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 08:30:54PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > container_of does not preserve the const-ness of a pointer that is
> > passed into it, which can cause C code that passes in a const pointer to
> > get a pointer back that is not const and then scribble all over the data
> > in it. To prevent this, container_of_const() will preserve the const
> > status of the pointer passed into it using the newly available _Generic()
> > method.
>
> "_const" in the name suggests that the macro would always take a const
> argument.
I mean it here to be "this will preserve const" as yes, it can take a
const. Or not.
> Could this be called e.g. container_of_safe() (for type-safe, but
> full type_safe would be a bit long)?
const is an attribute of type safety, container_of is also type-safe
as-is, it's just the const portion here that is the difference between
the two.
Naming is hard :(
>
> --
> Kind regards,
>
> Sakari Ailus