Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] hwrng: add Rockchip SoC hwrng driver
From: Aurelien Jarno
Date: Fri Dec 02 2022 - 14:30:24 EST
Hi,
Thanks for your feedback.
On 2022-11-29 10:33, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 28/11/2022 19:47, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/rockchip-rng.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/rockchip-rng.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..18cdd91ad8c3
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/rockchip-rng.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,250 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/*
> > + * rockchip-rng.c True Random Number Generator driver for Rockchip SoCs
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (c) 2018, Fuzhou Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd.
> > + * Copyright (c) 2022, Aurelien Jarno
> > + * Authors:
> > + * Lin Jinhan <troy.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > + * Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > + */
> > +#include <linux/clk.h>
> > +#include <linux/hw_random.h>
> > +#include <linux/io.h>
> > +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
> > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> > +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> > +#include <linux/reset.h>
> > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > +
> > +#define RK_RNG_AUTOSUSPEND_DELAY 100
> > +#define RK_RNG_MAX_BYTE 32
> > +#define RK_RNG_POLL_PERIOD_US 100
> > +#define RK_RNG_POLL_TIMEOUT_US 10000
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * TRNG collects osc ring output bit every RK_RNG_SAMPLE_CNT time. The value is
> > + * a tradeoff between speed and quality and has been adjusted to get a quality
> > + * of ~900 (~90% of FIPS 140-2 successes).
> > + */
> > +#define RK_RNG_SAMPLE_CNT 1000
> > +
> > +/* TRNG registers from RK3568 TRM-Part2, section 5.4.1 */
> > +#define TRNG_RST_CTL 0x0004
> > +#define TRNG_RNG_CTL 0x0400
> > +#define TRNG_RNG_CTL_LEN_64_BIT (0x00 << 4)
> > +#define TRNG_RNG_CTL_LEN_128_BIT (0x01 << 4)
> > +#define TRNG_RNG_CTL_LEN_192_BIT (0x02 << 4)
> > +#define TRNG_RNG_CTL_LEN_256_BIT (0x03 << 4)
> > +#define TRNG_RNG_CTL_OSC_RING_SPEED_0 (0x00 << 2)
> > +#define TRNG_RNG_CTL_OSC_RING_SPEED_1 (0x01 << 2)
> > +#define TRNG_RNG_CTL_OSC_RING_SPEED_2 (0x02 << 2)
> > +#define TRNG_RNG_CTL_OSC_RING_SPEED_3 (0x03 << 2)
> > +#define TRNG_RNG_CTL_ENABLE BIT(1)
> > +#define TRNG_RNG_CTL_START BIT(0)
> > +#define TRNG_RNG_SAMPLE_CNT 0x0404
> > +#define TRNG_RNG_DOUT_0 0x0410
> > +#define TRNG_RNG_DOUT_1 0x0414
> > +#define TRNG_RNG_DOUT_2 0x0418
> > +#define TRNG_RNG_DOUT_3 0x041c
> > +#define TRNG_RNG_DOUT_4 0x0420
> > +#define TRNG_RNG_DOUT_5 0x0424
> > +#define TRNG_RNG_DOUT_6 0x0428
> > +#define TRNG_RNG_DOUT_7 0x042c
> > +
> > +struct rk_rng {
> > + struct hwrng rng;
> > + void __iomem *base;
> > + struct reset_control *rst;
> > + int clk_num;
> > + struct clk_bulk_data *clk_bulks;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* The mask determine the bits that are updated */
> > +static void rk_rng_write_ctl(struct rk_rng *rng, u32 val, u32 mask)
> > +{
> > + writel_relaxed((mask << 16) | val, rng->base + TRNG_RNG_CTL);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int rk_rng_init(struct hwrng *rng)
> > +{
> > + struct rk_rng *rk_rng = container_of(rng, struct rk_rng, rng);
> > + u32 reg;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + /* start clocks */
> > + ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(rk_rng->clk_num, rk_rng->clk_bulks);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + dev_err((struct device *) rk_rng->rng.priv,
> > + "Failed to enable clks %d\n", ret);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* set the sample period */
> > + writel(RK_RNG_SAMPLE_CNT, rk_rng->base + TRNG_RNG_SAMPLE_CNT);
> > +
> > + /* set osc ring speed and enable it */
> > + reg = TRNG_RNG_CTL_LEN_256_BIT |
>
> It's not reg. It's val.
Ok, I'll fix that.
> > + TRNG_RNG_CTL_OSC_RING_SPEED_0 |
> > + TRNG_RNG_CTL_ENABLE;
> > + rk_rng_write_ctl(rk_rng, reg, 0xffff);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void rk_rng_cleanup(struct hwrng *rng)
> > +{
> > + struct rk_rng *rk_rng = container_of(rng, struct rk_rng, rng);
> > + u32 reg;
> > +
> > + /* stop TRNG */
> > + reg = 0;
>
> It's not reg. It's val.
I'll also fix that one.
> > + rk_rng_write_ctl(rk_rng, reg, 0xffff);
> > +
> > + /* stop clocks */
> > + clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(rk_rng->clk_num, rk_rng->clk_bulks);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int rk_rng_read(struct hwrng *rng, void *buf, size_t max, bool wait)
> > +{
> > + struct rk_rng *rk_rng = container_of(rng, struct rk_rng, rng);
> > + u32 reg;
> > + int ret = 0;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + pm_runtime_get_sync((struct device *) rk_rng->rng.priv);
>
> Missing error handling.
I'll fix that.
> > +
> > + /* Start collecting random data */
> > + reg = TRNG_RNG_CTL_START;
>
> This is not usefull. Just use it directly in write call. Actually this
> is heavy confusing, as reg suggests address. This would be val instead...
This was to avoid passing the value twice, as it is used for both the
mask and the value. But I can pass it directly if it's better.
> > + rk_rng_write_ctl(rk_rng, reg, reg);
> > +
> > + ret = readl_poll_timeout(rk_rng->base + TRNG_RNG_CTL, reg,
> > + !(reg & TRNG_RNG_CTL_START),
> > + RK_RNG_POLL_PERIOD_US,
> > + RK_RNG_POLL_TIMEOUT_US);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > + /* Read random data stored in the registers */
> > + ret = min_t(size_t, max, RK_RNG_MAX_BYTE);
> > + for (i = 0; i < ret; i += 4) {
> > + *(u32 *)(buf + i) = readl_relaxed(rk_rng->base + TRNG_RNG_DOUT_0 + i);
> > + }
>
> This cannot be just memcpy_fromio?
According to the TRM, we should ensure 32-bit accesses, so I am not sure
memcpy_fromio will work. However it seems __ioread32_copy could be a
good replacement.
> > +
> > +out:
> > + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy((struct device *) rk_rng->rng.priv);
> > + pm_runtime_put_sync_autosuspend((struct device *) rk_rng->rng.priv);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int rk_rng_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > + struct rk_rng *rk_rng;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + rk_rng = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct rk_rng), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> sizeof(*rk_rng)
I'll fix that.
> > + if (!rk_rng)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
Regards
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.aurel32.net