Re: [PATCH v4 07/39] x86: Add user control-protection fault handler

[Kees Cook]

On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 04:35:34PM -0800, Rick Edgecombe wrote:
> From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> A control-protection fault is triggered when a control-flow transfer
> attempt violates Shadow Stack or Indirect Branch Tracking constraints.
> For example, the return address for a RET instruction differs from the copy
> on the shadow stack.
> 
> There already exists a control-protection fault handler for handling kernel
> IBT. Refactor this fault handler into sparate user and kernel handlers,
> like the page fault handler. Add a control-protection handler for usermode.
> 
> Keep the same behavior for the kernel side of the fault handler, except for
> converting a BUG to a WARN in the case of a #CP happening when
> !cpu_feature_enabled(). This unifies the behavior with the new shadow stack
> code, and also prevents the kernel from crashing under this situation which
> is potentially recoverable.
> 
> The control-protection fault handler works in a similar way as the general
> protection fault handler. It provides the si_code SEGV_CPERR to the signal
> handler.
> 
> Tested-by: Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: John Allen <john.allen@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
> Co-developed-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@xxxxxxxxx>

This looks nice cleaner to me. Thanks!

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Kees Cook