Re: [RFC PATCH] gfs2: Fix missing cleanup quota in gfs2_put_super()

From: Andreas Gruenbacher
Date: Sat Dec 03 2022 - 08:16:25 EST

Hello,

thank you for this bug report.

On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 8:28 AM Wangshaobo (bobo)
<bobo.shaobowang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 在 2022/12/1 19:50, Wang ShaoBo 写道:
> > syzbot has reported an interesting issue:
> >
> > INFO: task syz-executor888:3126 blocked for more than 143 seconds.
> > Not tainted 6.1.0-rc6-syzkaller-32662-g6d464646530f #0
> > "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> > task:syz-executor888 state:D stack:0 pid:3126 ppid:3124 flags:0x00000000
> > Call trace:
> > __switch_to+0x180/0x298 arch/arm64/kernel/process.c:553
> > context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5209 [inline]
> > __schedule+0x408/0x594 kernel/sched/core.c:6521
> > schedule+0x64/0xa4 kernel/sched/core.c:6597
> > schedule_timeout+0x108/0x1b4 kernel/time/timer.c:1935
> > gfs2_gl_hash_clear+0xd4/0x1b0 fs/gfs2/glock.c:2263
> > gfs2_put_super+0x318/0x390 fs/gfs2/super.c:620
> > generic_shutdown_super+0x94/0x198 fs/super.c:492
> > kill_block_super+0x30/0x78 fs/super.c:1428
> > gfs2_kill_sb+0x68/0x78
> > deactivate_locked_super+0x70/0xe8 fs/super.c:332
> > deactivate_super+0xd0/0xd4 fs/super.c:363
> > cleanup_mnt+0x184/0x1c0 fs/namespace.c:1186
> > __cleanup_mnt+0x20/0x30 fs/namespace.c:1193
> > task_work_run+0x100/0x148 kernel/task_work.c:179
> > resume_user_mode_work include/linux/resume_user_mode.h:49 [inline]
> > do_notify_resume+0x174/0x1f0 arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c:1127
> > prepare_exit_to_user_mode arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:137 [inline]
> > exit_to_user_mode arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:142 [inline]
> > el0_svc+0x9c/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:638
> > el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:655
> > el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:584
> >
> > Showing all locks held in the system:
> > 1 lock held by rcu_tasks_kthre/11:
> > #0: ffff80000d4a4768 (rcu_tasks.tasks_gp_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rcu_tasks_one_gp+0x3c/0x450 kernel/rcu/tasks.h:507
> > 1 lock held by rcu_tasks_trace/12:
> > #0: ffff80000d4a4db8 (rcu_tasks_trace.tasks_gp_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rcu_tasks_one_gp+0x3c/0x450 kernel/rcu/tasks.h:507
> > 1 lock held by khungtaskd/27:
> > #0: ffff80000d4a4640 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x4/0x48 include/linux/rcupdate.h:303
> > 2 locks held by getty/2759:
> > #0: ffff0000c7d7e098 (&tty->ldisc_sem){++++}-{0:0}, at: tty_ldisc_ref_wait+0x28/0x58 drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c:244
> > #1: ffff80000f6be2f0 (&ldata->atomic_read_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: n_tty_read+0x19c/0x89c drivers/tty/n_tty.c:2177
> > 1 lock held by syz-executor888/3126:
> > #0: ffff0000cae680e0 (&type->s_umount_key#41){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: deactivate_super+0xc8/0xd4 fs/super.c:362
> >
> > =============================================
> >
> > One task blocked after executing gfs2_gl_hash_clear(), it looks
> > like go to sleep for waiting the condition (&sdp->sd_glock_disposal == 0),
> > this field sd_glock_disposal is used to count the getting times
> > that calling gfs2_glock_get() success, In most cases, when we operate
> > the mount interface, we will finally call this function:
> >
> > do_mount()
> > path_mount()
> > vfs_get_tree()
> > gfs2_get_tree()
> > get_tree_bdev()
> > gfs2_fill_super()
> > ________ init_inodes()_____________
> > V V
> > gfs2_lookup_simple() gfs2_rindex_update()
> > gfs2_lookupi() gfs2_ri_update()
> > gfs2_dir_search() -> read_rindex_entry() //*gfs2_rgrpd->rd_gl
> > -> gfs2_inode_lookup() //*gfs2_inode->i_gl |__ gfs2_glock_get()
> > |__gfs2_glock_get()
> >
> > Correspondingly, release this glock's reference and decrease
> > sdp->sd_glock_disposal through this path when umount:
> >
> > cleanup_mnt()
> > deactivate_super()
> > deactivate_locked_super()
> > gfs2_kill_sb()
> > kill_block_super()
> > generic_shutdown_super()
> > _gfs2_rgrpd->rd_gl__gfs2_put_super()__gfs2_inode->i_gl__
> > V V
> > gfs2_clear_rgrpd() gfs2_put_super()
> > gfs2_glock_put() iput()
> > gfs2_glock_free() evict()
> > gfs2_evict_inode()
> > gfs2_glock_put_eventually()
> > gfs2_glock_put()
> > gfs2_glock_free()
> >
> > But if calling reconfigure_super() from sysfs between mount and umount,

How are you doing that?

> > this path will also take the glock lock and increase sdp->sd_glock_disposal
> > as it also call gfs2_glock_get():
> >
> > reconfigure_super()
> > gfs2_reconfigure()
> > gfs2_make_fs_rw() //remount filesystem read-write
> > gfs2_quota_init()
> > -> qd_alloc() //*gfs2_quota_data->qd_gl
> > |___ gfs2_glock_get()
> >
> > This relies on gfs2_quota_cleanup() that is eventually called by
> > gfs2_make_fs_ro() to clean up but unfortunately the file system
> > has not been remounted at this time, the condition (!sb_rdonly(sb))
> > is false and gfs2_make_fs_ro() can not be called, ultimately makes
> > sdp->sd_glock_disposal never be 0.
> >
> > This add calling gfs2_quota_cleanup() when this filesystem remains
> > readOnly, in this case we don't need sync quota or other operation
> > otherwise the filesystem was really remounted.
> >
> > But this modification will trigger this warning:
> >
> > WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 2595 at include/linux/backing-dev.h:246 __folio_mark_dirty+0x559/0x7b0
> I paste wrong, the warning is:
> gfs2: fsid=mounts.0: warning: assertion "!qd->qd_change" failed at
> function = gfs2_quota_cleanup, file = fs/gfs2/quota.c, line = 1474

Thanks, this is making more sense now.

> qd->qd_change has been changed in gfs2_quota_init(), but it looks
> we don't need to do anything before remounting the file system as
> read-write.
> >
> > We can filter this warning with adding a parameter as it doesn't
> > really make sense here.
> >
> > Fixes: 9e6e0a128bca ("GFS2: Merge mount.c and ops_super.c into super.c")
> > Reported-by: syzbot+ed7d0f71a89e28557a77@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Signed-off-by: Wang ShaoBo <bobo.shaobowang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > fs/gfs2/super.c | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/gfs2/super.c b/fs/gfs2/super.c
> > index b018957a1bb2..9a3c6da8db55 100644
> > --- a/fs/gfs2/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/gfs2/super.c
> > @@ -586,7 +586,10 @@ static void gfs2_put_super(struct super_block *sb)
> >
> > if (!sb_rdonly(sb)) {
> > gfs2_make_fs_ro(sdp);
> > + } else {
> > + gfs2_quota_cleanup(sdp);
> > }
> > +
> > WARN_ON(gfs2_withdrawing(sdp));
> >
> > /* At this point, we're through modifying the disk */
> >
>

Andreas