Re: [PATCH 1/3] sched/uclamp: Fix a uninitialized variable warnings
From: Qais Yousef
Date: Sat Dec 03 2022 - 09:32:52 EST
On 12/01/22 23:38, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> On 27/11/2022 15:17, Qais Yousef wrote:
> > Addresses the following warnings:
> >
> >> config: riscv-randconfig-m031-20221111
> >> compiler: riscv64-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0
> >>
> >> smatch warnings:
> >> kernel/sched/fair.c:7263 find_energy_efficient_cpu() error: uninitialized symbol 'util_min'.
> >> kernel/sched/fair.c:7263 find_energy_efficient_cpu() error: uninitialized symbol 'util_max'.
> >
> > Fixes: 244226035a1f ("sched/uclamp: Fix fits_capacity() check in feec()")
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef (Google) <qyousef@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > kernel/sched/fair.c | 7 ++-----
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > index 4cc56c91e06e..89dadaafc1ec 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > @@ -7217,10 +7217,10 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
> > eenv_task_busy_time(&eenv, p, prev_cpu);
> >
> > for (; pd; pd = pd->next) {
> > + unsigned long util_min = p_util_min, util_max = p_util_max;
> > unsigned long cpu_cap, cpu_thermal_cap, util;
> > unsigned long cur_delta, max_spare_cap = 0;
> > unsigned long rq_util_min, rq_util_max;
> > - unsigned long util_min, util_max;
> > unsigned long prev_spare_cap = 0;
> > int max_spare_cap_cpu = -1;
> > unsigned long base_energy;
> > @@ -7258,10 +7258,7 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
> > * aligned with sched_cpu_util().
> > */
> > if (uclamp_is_used()) {
> > - if (uclamp_rq_is_idle(cpu_rq(cpu))) {
> > - util_min = p_util_min;
> > - util_max = p_util_max;
> > - } else {
> > + if (!uclamp_rq_is_idle(cpu_rq(cpu))) {
> > /*
> > * Open code uclamp_rq_util_with() except for
> > * the clamp() part. Ie: apply max aggregation
>
> Can we use `struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu)` to reduce nesting and comply
> with 80 columns line length?
Yep, that's better!
Thanks!
--
Qais Yousef
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 89dadaafc1ec..6a2fc2ca5078 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -7239,6 +7239,8 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
> eenv.pd_cap = 0;
>
> for_each_cpu(cpu, cpus) {
> + struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
> +
> eenv.pd_cap += cpu_thermal_cap;
>
> if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, sched_domain_span(sd)))
> @@ -7257,21 +7259,19 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
> * much capacity we can get out of the CPU; this is
> * aligned with sched_cpu_util().
> */
> - if (uclamp_is_used()) {
> - if (!uclamp_rq_is_idle(cpu_rq(cpu))) {
> - /*
> - * Open code uclamp_rq_util_with() except for
> - * the clamp() part. Ie: apply max aggregation
> - * only. util_fits_cpu() logic requires to
> - * operate on non clamped util but must use the
> - * max-aggregated uclamp_{min, max}.
> - */
> - rq_util_min = uclamp_rq_get(cpu_rq(cpu), UCLAMP_MIN);
> - rq_util_max = uclamp_rq_get(cpu_rq(cpu), UCLAMP_MAX);
> -
> - util_min = max(rq_util_min, p_util_min);
> - util_max = max(rq_util_max, p_util_max);
> - }
> + if (uclamp_is_used() && !uclamp_rq_is_idle(rq)) {
> + /*
> + * Open code uclamp_rq_util_with() except for
> + * the clamp() part. Ie: apply max aggregation
> + * only. util_fits_cpu() logic requires to
> + * operate on non clamped util but must use the
> + * max-aggregated uclamp_{min, max}.
> + */
> + rq_util_min = uclamp_rq_get(rq, UCLAMP_MIN);
> + rq_util_max = uclamp_rq_get(rq, UCLAMP_MAX);
> +
> + util_min = max(rq_util_min, p_util_min);
> + util_max = max(rq_util_max, p_util_max);
> }
> if (!util_fits_cpu(util, util_min, util_max, cpu))
> continue;