Re: [PATCH v1 4/7] net: phy: motorcomm: Add YT8531 phy support
From: yanhong wang
Date: Tue Dec 06 2022 - 02:40:05 EST
On 2022/12/1 23:40, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> +static const struct ytphy_reg_field ytphy_rxtxd_grp[] = {
>> + { "rx_delay_sel", GENMASK(13, 10), 0x0 },
>> + { "tx_delay_sel_fe", GENMASK(7, 4), 0xf },
>> + { "tx_delay_sel", GENMASK(3, 0), 0x1 }
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct ytphy_reg_field ytphy_txinver_grp[] = {
>> + { "tx_inverted_1000", BIT(14), 0x0 },
>> + { "tx_inverted_100", BIT(14), 0x0 },
>> + { "tx_inverted_10", BIT(14), 0x0 }
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct ytphy_reg_field ytphy_rxden_grp[] = {
>> + { "rxc_dly_en", BIT(8), 0x1 }
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int ytphy_config_init(struct phy_device *phydev)
>> +{
>> + struct device_node *of_node;
>> + u32 val;
>> + u32 mask;
>> + u32 cfg;
>> + int ret;
>> + int i = 0;
>> +
>> + of_node = phydev->mdio.dev.of_node;
>> + if (of_node) {
>> + ret = of_property_read_u32(of_node, ytphy_rxden_grp[0].name, &cfg);
>
> You need to document the device tree binding.
>
> Frank Sae always gets the locking wrong in this driver. Have you
> tested your patch with lockdep enabled?
>
I will add document to describe details in the next version, such as "rx_delay_sel","tx_inverted_10" etc.
> Andrew