Re: [PATCH 5/6] dt-bindings: crypto: Add bindings for Starfive crypto driver

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 06/12/2022 04:48, JiaJie Ho wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2022 9:48 PM
>> To: JiaJie Ho <jiajie.ho@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Rob
>> Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Herbert Xu
>> <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Krzysztof Kozlowski
>> <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; David S . Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] dt-bindings: crypto: Add bindings for Starfive crypto
>> driver
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 30 Nov 2022 13:52:13 +0800, Jia Jie Ho wrote:
>>> Add documentation to describe Starfive crypto driver bindings.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jia Jie Ho <jiajie.ho@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Huan Feng <huan.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  .../bindings/crypto/starfive-crypto.yaml      | 109 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 109 insertions(+)
>>>  create mode 100644
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/starfive-crypto.yaml
>>>
>>
>> My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m
>> dt_binding_check'
>> on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
>>
>> yamllint warnings/errors:
>>
>> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/starfive-
>> crypto.example.dts:21:18: fatal error: dt-bindings/clock/starfive-jh7110.h: No
>> such file or directory
>>    21 |         #include <dt-bindings/clock/starfive-jh7110.h>
>>       |                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> compilation terminated.
>> make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.lib:406:
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/starfive-crypto.example.dtb]
>> Error 1
>> make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>> make: *** [Makefile:1492: dt_binding_check] Error 2
>>
>> doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):
>>
>> See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-
>> bindings/patch/20221130055214.2416888-6-jiajie.ho@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> The base for the series is generally the latest rc1. A different dependency
>> should be noted in *this* patch.
>>
> 
> Hi Rob Herring,
> 
> The #include in example have dependencies on the following patches:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/cover/20221118010627.70576-1-hal.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/cover/20221118011714.70877-1-hal.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> I've noted them in the cover letter.
> How do I add them in this patch?

You cannot. Testing bot does not take dependencies, so it did not have
above clock IDs. This also should point your attention that if crypto
maintainers pick up this patch, they also won't have the clock IDs so
their tree will have such failure as well.

You can wait with your patch till dependency hits mainline or you can
just replace clock IDs with numbers and drop the header (and later you
can correct the example if needed... or leave it as is).

Best regards,
Krzysztof