Pu Lehui <pulehui@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Wouldn't that work?
It definitely works. But auipc+addi may be some holes, while
lui+addi+slli support all the address of kernel and module. And this
might be help for the future feature porting.
We're already using auipc/jalr for calls, and I'd say it *very* unlikely
that we'll hit the non-covered range. I'd say go with auipc/addi +
error, and we can change if this really is a problem.