Re: [PATCH] powerpc/ftrace: fix syscall tracing on PPC64_ELF_ABI_V1
From: Mathieu Desnoyers
Date: Tue Dec 06 2022 - 09:38:03 EST
On 2022-12-05 17:50, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Michael Jeanson <mjeanson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On 2022-12-05 15:11, Michael Jeanson wrote:
Michael Jeanson <mjeanson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
In v5.7 the powerpc syscall entry/exit logic was rewritten in C, on
PPC64_ELF_ABI_V1 this resulted in the symbols in the syscall table
changing from their dot prefixed variant to the non-prefixed ones.
Since ftrace prefixes a dot to the syscall names when matching them to
build its syscall event list, this resulted in no syscall events being
available.
Remove the PPC64_ELF_ABI_V1 specific version of
arch_syscall_match_sym_name to have the same behavior across all powerpc
variants.
This doesn't seem to work for me.
Event with it applied I still don't see anything in
/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/syscalls
Did we break it in some other way recently?
cheers
I did some further testing, my config also enabled KALLSYMS_ALL, when I remove
it there is indeed no syscall events.
Aha, OK that explains it I guess.
I was using ppc64_guest_defconfig which has ABI_V1 and FTRACE_SYSCALLS,
but does not have KALLSYMS_ALL. So I guess there's some other bug
lurking in there.
I don't have the setup handy to validate it, but I suspect it is caused
by the way scripts/kallsyms.c:symbol_valid() checks whether a symbol
entry needs to be integrated into the assembler output when
--all-symbols is not specified. It only keeps symbols which addresses
are in the text range. On PPC64_ELF_ABI_V1, this means only the
dot-prefixed symbols will be kept (those point to the function begin),
leaving out the non-dot-prefixed symbols (those point to the function
descriptors).
So I see two possible solutions there: either we ensure that
FTRACE_SYSCALLS selects KALLSYMS_ALL on PPC64_ELF_ABI_V1, or we modify
scripts/kallsyms.c:symbol_valid() to also include function descriptor
symbols. This would mean accepting symbols pointing into the .opd ELF
section.
IMHO the second option would be better because it does not increase the
kernel image size as much as KALLSYMS_ALL.
Thoughts ?
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com