Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] nvme-pci: add function nvme_submit_vf_cmd to issue admin commands for VF driver.
From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Tue Dec 06 2022 - 11:55:14 EST
On Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 11:51:23AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> That is a big deviation from where VFIO is right now, the controlled
> function is the one with the VFIO driver, it should be the one that
> drives the migration uAPI components.
Well, that is one way to see it, but I think the more natural
way to deal with it is to drive everyting from the controlling
function, because that is by definition much more in control.
More importantly any sane design will have easy ways to list and
manipulate all the controlled functions from the controlling
functions, while getting from the controlled function to the
controlling one is extremely awkward, as anything that can be
used for that is by definition and information leak. It seems
mlx5 just gets away with that by saying controlled functions are
always VFs, and the controlling function is a PF, but that will
break down very easily, especially once you want to nest the
controlling scheme (and yes, I'm not making this up, as the
nesting scheme is being proposed for nvme privately).