Re: [PATCH v11 3/6] remoteproc: pru: Add APIs to get and put the PRU cores

From: Roger Quadros
Date: Thu Dec 08 2022 - 05:40:38 EST


Hi,

On 07/12/2022 13:04, MD Danish Anwar wrote:
> Add two new APIs, pru_rproc_get() and pru_rproc_put(), to the PRU
> driver to allow client drivers to acquire and release the remoteproc
> device associated with a PRU core. The PRU cores are treated as
> resources with only one client owning it at a time.
>
> The pru_rproc_get() function returns the rproc handle corresponding
> to a PRU core identified by the device tree "ti,prus" property under
> the client node. The pru_rproc_put() is the complementary function
> to pru_rproc_get().
>
> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@xxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@xxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Grzegorz Jaszczyk <grzegorz.jaszczyk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar@xxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c | 133 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/linux/pruss.h | 29 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c
> index a1a208b31846..7d4ed39b3772 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c
> @@ -2,12 +2,14 @@
> /*
> * PRU-ICSS remoteproc driver for various TI SoCs
> *
> - * Copyright (C) 2014-2020 Texas Instruments Incorporated - https://www.ti.com/
> + * Copyright (C) 2014-2022 Texas Instruments Incorporated - https://www.ti.com/
> *
> * Author(s):
> * Suman Anna <s-anna@xxxxxx>
> * Andrew F. Davis <afd@xxxxxx>
> * Grzegorz Jaszczyk <grzegorz.jaszczyk@xxxxxxxxxx> for Texas Instruments
> + * Puranjay Mohan <p-mohan@xxxxxx>
> + * Md Danish Anwar <danishanwar@xxxxxx>
> */
>
> #include <linux/bitops.h>
> @@ -112,6 +114,8 @@ struct pru_private_data {
> * @rproc: remoteproc pointer for this PRU core
> * @data: PRU core specific data
> * @mem_regions: data for each of the PRU memory regions
> + * @client_np: client device node
> + * @lock: mutex to protect client usage
> * @fw_name: name of firmware image used during loading
> * @mapped_irq: virtual interrupt numbers of created fw specific mapping
> * @pru_interrupt_map: pointer to interrupt mapping description (firmware)
> @@ -127,6 +131,8 @@ struct pru_rproc {
> struct rproc *rproc;
> const struct pru_private_data *data;
> struct pruss_mem_region mem_regions[PRU_IOMEM_MAX];
> + struct device_node *client_np;
> + struct mutex lock;
> const char *fw_name;
> unsigned int *mapped_irq;
> struct pru_irq_rsc *pru_interrupt_map;
> @@ -147,6 +153,125 @@ void pru_control_write_reg(struct pru_rproc *pru, unsigned int reg, u32 val)
> writel_relaxed(val, pru->mem_regions[PRU_IOMEM_CTRL].va + reg);
> }
>
> +static struct rproc *__pru_rproc_get(struct device_node *np, int index)
> +{
> + struct rproc *rproc;
> + phandle rproc_phandle;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32_index(np, "ti,prus", index, &rproc_phandle);
> + if (ret)
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +
> + rproc = rproc_get_by_phandle(rproc_phandle);
> + if (!rproc) {
> + ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> + goto err_no_rproc_handle;
> + }
> +
> + /* make sure it is PRU rproc */
> + if (!is_pru_rproc(rproc->dev.parent)) {
> + rproc_put(rproc);
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> + }
> +
> + return rproc;
> +
> +err_no_rproc_handle:
> + rproc_put(rproc);
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * pru_rproc_get() - get the PRU rproc instance from a device node
> + * @np: the user/client device node
> + * @index: index to use for the ti,prus property
> + * @pru_id: optional pointer to return the PRU remoteproc processor id
> + *
> + * This function looks through a client device node's "ti,prus" property at
> + * index @index and returns the rproc handle for a valid PRU remote processor if
> + * found. The function allows only one user to own the PRU rproc resource at a
> + * time. Caller must call pru_rproc_put() when done with using the rproc, not
> + * required if the function returns a failure.
> + *
> + * When optional @pru_id pointer is passed the PRU remoteproc processor id is
> + * returned.
> + *
> + * Return: rproc handle on success, and an ERR_PTR on failure using one
> + * of the following error values
> + * -ENODEV if device is not found
> + * -EBUSY if PRU is already acquired by anyone
> + * -EPROBE_DEFER is PRU device is not probed yet
> + */
> +struct rproc *pru_rproc_get(struct device_node *np, int index,
> + enum pruss_pru_id *pru_id)
> +{
> + struct rproc *rproc;
> + struct pru_rproc *pru;
> + struct device *dev;
> + int ret;
> +
> + rproc = __pru_rproc_get(np, index);
> + if (IS_ERR(rproc))
> + return rproc;
> +
> + pru = rproc->priv;
> + dev = &rproc->dev;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&pru->lock);
> +
> + if (pru->client_np) {
> + mutex_unlock(&pru->lock);
> + put_device(dev);

Is this put_device() to counter balance the get_device() you had earlier?
Is it still needed?

Did we do the right thing by getting rid of the additional get_device()?
I didn't see a reason for it.

> + ret = -EBUSY;
> + goto err_no_rproc_handle;
> + }
> +
> + pru->client_np = np;
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&pru->lock);
> +
> + if (pru_id)
> + *pru_id = pru->id;
> +
> + return rproc;
> +
> +err_no_rproc_handle:
> + rproc_put(rproc);
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pru_rproc_get);
> +
> +/**
> + * pru_rproc_put() - release the PRU rproc resource
> + * @rproc: the rproc resource to release
> + *
> + * Releases the PRU rproc resource and makes it available to other
> + * users.
> + */
> +void pru_rproc_put(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> + struct pru_rproc *pru;
> +
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rproc) || !is_pru_rproc(rproc->dev.parent))
> + return;
> +
> + pru = rproc->priv;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&pru->lock);
> +
> + if (!pru->client_np) {
> + mutex_unlock(&pru->lock);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + pru->client_np = NULL;
> + mutex_unlock(&pru->lock);
> +
> + rproc_put(rproc);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pru_rproc_put);
> +
> static inline u32 pru_debug_read_reg(struct pru_rproc *pru, unsigned int reg)
> {
> return readl_relaxed(pru->mem_regions[PRU_IOMEM_DEBUG].va + reg);
> @@ -817,6 +942,8 @@ static int pru_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> pru->pruss = platform_get_drvdata(ppdev);
> pru->rproc = rproc;
> pru->fw_name = fw_name;
> + pru->client_np = NULL;
> + mutex_init(&pru->lock);
>
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mem_names); i++) {
> res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
> @@ -905,7 +1032,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, pru_rproc_match);
>
> static struct platform_driver pru_rproc_driver = {
> .driver = {
> - .name = "pru-rproc",
> + .name = PRU_RPROC_DRVNAME,
> .of_match_table = pru_rproc_match,
> .suppress_bind_attrs = true,
> },
> @@ -917,5 +1044,7 @@ module_platform_driver(pru_rproc_driver);
> MODULE_AUTHOR("Suman Anna <s-anna@xxxxxx>");
> MODULE_AUTHOR("Andrew F. Davis <afd@xxxxxx>");
> MODULE_AUTHOR("Grzegorz Jaszczyk <grzegorz.jaszczyk@xxxxxxxxxx>");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Puranjay Mohan <p-mohan@xxxxxx>");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Md Danish Anwar <danishanwar@xxxxxx>");
> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("PRU-ICSS Remote Processor Driver");
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> diff --git a/include/linux/pruss.h b/include/linux/pruss.h
> index fbe4fbb45807..6ea737e995e9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pruss.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pruss.h
> @@ -28,5 +28,34 @@ enum pruss_pru_id {
> PRUSS_NUM_PRUS,
> };
>
> +struct device_node;
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PRU_REMOTEPROC)
> +
> +struct rproc *pru_rproc_get(struct device_node *np, int index,
> + enum pruss_pru_id *pru_id);
> +void pru_rproc_put(struct rproc *rproc);
> +
> +#else
> +
> +static inline struct rproc *
> +pru_rproc_get(struct device_node *np, int index, enum pruss_pru_id *pru_id)
> +{
> + return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void pru_rproc_put(struct rproc *rproc) { }
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_PRU_REMOTEPROC */
> +
> +static inline bool is_pru_rproc(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + const char *drv_name = dev_driver_string(dev);
> +
> + if (strncmp(drv_name, PRU_RPROC_DRVNAME, sizeof(PRU_RPROC_DRVNAME)))
> + return false;
> +
> + return true;
> +}
>
> #endif /* __LINUX_PRUSS_H */
> \ No newline at end of file

--
cheers,
-roger