Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] i2c-atr and FPDLink

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 05:57:23PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 04:40:58PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > On 08/12/2022 14:26, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 12:42:13PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > > > On 08/12/2022 12:39, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:

...

> > > >   /**
> > > > - * Helper to add I2C ATR features to a device driver.
> > > > + * struct i2c_atr - Represents the I2C ATR instance
> > > >    */
> > > 
> > > This is incomplete. Have you run kernel doc validator against this file?
> > 
> > What's kernel doc validator? Do you mean that it's incomplete and kernel doc
> > doesn't work correctly, or that there should be more information here?
> > 
> > I don't get any errors/warnings from any tool I have used. But I agree it
> > looks a bit odd with only the name of the struct in the doc.
> 
> ...
> 
> $ scripts/kernel-doc -none -v include/linux/i2c.h
> include/linux/i2c.h:79: warning: No description found for return value of 'i2c_master_recv'
> include/linux/i2c.h:94: warning: No description found for return value of 'i2c_master_recv_dmasafe'
> include/linux/i2c.h:109: warning: No description found for return value of 'i2c_master_send'
> include/linux/i2c.h:124: warning: No description found for return value of 'i2c_master_send_dmasafe'
> 4 warnings

Note, this is just example against existing file, not your case.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko