Re: [PATCH] mfd: axp20x: fix order of pek rise and fall events

[Aren]

Hi, thanks for taking a look at this

On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 12:43:15AM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote:
> On 11/23/22 17:07, Aren Moynihan wrote:
> > The power button can get "stuck" if the rising edge and falling edge irq
> > are read in the same pass. This can often be triggered when resuming
> > from suspend if the power button is released before the kernel handles
> > the interrupt.
> >
> > Swapping the order of the rise and fall events makes sure that the press
> > event is handled first, which prevents this situation.
>
> Indeed. This is probably the simplest solution, but I think it deserves
> a comment in at least one place that the order intentionally mismatches
> the order of the bits in the register.

Alright, I've sent a v2 with comments explaining the order
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221208220225.635414-1-aren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/

> > Signed-off-by: Aren Moynihan <aren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h | 10 +++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h b/include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h
> > index 9ab0e2fca7ea..a13ba2bdd01f 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h
> > @@ -432,8 +432,8 @@ enum {
> >  	AXP152_IRQ_PEK_SHORT,
> >  	AXP152_IRQ_PEK_LONG,
> >  	AXP152_IRQ_TIMER,
> > -	AXP152_IRQ_PEK_RIS_EDGE,
> >  	AXP152_IRQ_PEK_FAL_EDGE,
> > +	AXP152_IRQ_PEK_RIS_EDGE,
> >  	AXP152_IRQ_GPIO3_INPUT,
> >  	AXP152_IRQ_GPIO2_INPUT,
> >  	AXP152_IRQ_GPIO1_INPUT,
> > @@ -472,8 +472,8 @@ enum {
> >  	AXP20X_IRQ_LOW_PWR_LVL1,
> >  	AXP20X_IRQ_LOW_PWR_LVL2,
> >  	AXP20X_IRQ_TIMER,
> > -	AXP20X_IRQ_PEK_RIS_EDGE,
> >  	AXP20X_IRQ_PEK_FAL_EDGE,
> > +	AXP20X_IRQ_PEK_RIS_EDGE,
> >  	AXP20X_IRQ_GPIO3_INPUT,
> >  	AXP20X_IRQ_GPIO2_INPUT,
> >  	AXP20X_IRQ_GPIO1_INPUT,
> > @@ -502,8 +502,8 @@ enum axp22x_irqs {
> >  	AXP22X_IRQ_LOW_PWR_LVL1,
> >  	AXP22X_IRQ_LOW_PWR_LVL2,
> >  	AXP22X_IRQ_TIMER,
> > -	AXP22X_IRQ_PEK_RIS_EDGE,
> >  	AXP22X_IRQ_PEK_FAL_EDGE,
> > +	AXP22X_IRQ_PEK_RIS_EDGE,
> >  	AXP22X_IRQ_GPIO1_INPUT,
> >  	AXP22X_IRQ_GPIO0_INPUT,
> >  };
> > @@ -571,8 +571,8 @@ enum axp803_irqs {
> >  	AXP803_IRQ_LOW_PWR_LVL1,
> >  	AXP803_IRQ_LOW_PWR_LVL2,
> >  	AXP803_IRQ_TIMER,
> > -	AXP803_IRQ_PEK_RIS_EDGE,
> >  	AXP803_IRQ_PEK_FAL_EDGE,
> > +	AXP803_IRQ_PEK_RIS_EDGE,
> >  	AXP803_IRQ_PEK_SHORT,
> >  	AXP803_IRQ_PEK_LONG,
> >  	AXP803_IRQ_PEK_OVER_OFF,
> > @@ -623,8 +623,8 @@ enum axp809_irqs {
> >  	AXP809_IRQ_LOW_PWR_LVL1,
> >  	AXP809_IRQ_LOW_PWR_LVL2,
> >  	AXP809_IRQ_TIMER,
> > -	AXP809_IRQ_PEK_RIS_EDGE,
> >  	AXP809_IRQ_PEK_FAL_EDGE,
> > +	AXP809_IRQ_PEK_RIS_EDGE,
> >  	AXP809_IRQ_PEK_SHORT,
> >  	AXP809_IRQ_PEK_LONG,
> >  	AXP809_IRQ_PEK_OVER_OFF,
>
> You should also update APX288 and APX806, which name the IRQs "POK"
> instead of "PEK" for some reason.

Thanks for point this out, it looks like these are already in the
correct order.

 - Aren