Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix unannoted hardirqs-on in return to userspace slow-path

From: Palmer Dabbelt
Date: Thu Dec 08 2022 - 18:44:08 EST

Next message: Palmer Dabbelt: "Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix unannoted hardirqs-on in return to userspace slow-path"
Previous message: Mike Kravetz: "Re: [RFC PATCH v2 02/47] hugetlb: remove mk_huge_pte; it is unused"
Next in thread: Palmer Dabbelt: "Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix unannoted hardirqs-on in return to userspace slow-path"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 14 Nov 2022 07:54:47 PST (-0800), guoren@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 11:42 PM Andrew Bresticker
<abrestic@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 10:31 AM Conor Dooley
<conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 10:20:30AM -0500, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 9:43 AM Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Nov 12, 2022 at 6:31 AM Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The return to userspace path in entry.S may enable interrupts without the
> > > > corresponding lockdep annotation, producing a splat[0] when DEBUG_LOCKDEP
> > > > is enabled. Simply calling __trace_hardirqs_on() here gets a bit messy
> > > > due to the use of RA to point back to ret_from_exception, so just move
> > > > the whole slow-path loop into C. It's more readable and it lets us use
> > > > local_irq_{enable,disable}(), avoiding the need for manual annotations
> > > > altogether.
> > > Could generic_entry solve your problem? please try:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20221103075047.1634923-1-guoren@xxxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > Indeed it does, as I mentioned below, however it wasn't clear to me
> > how close your series was to landing so I'v emailed this small fix for
> > the existing bug in case your series does not make it into 6.2
>
> The backportablilty of this 26+, 26- change has to be considered too.
> The generic entry patchset has 20x the changes and would not ordinarily
> be stable material. How much of that series would be required to solve
> the problem?

We'd need up to patch 6, "riscv: convert to generic entry":
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20221103075047.1634923-7-guoren@xxxxxxxxxx/

Yes, but 6 needs 1 and 5, and they are very small patches.

I'm just going to take this one, for the ease of backporting. The generic entry one keeps getting re-spun and I'm not sure it'll be in time for 6.2, so at least this way we can get the fix in now.

I've merge th is just on top of 6.1-rc1, so it's easier to deal with any conflicts later.

Thanks!

-Andrew

>
> > >
> > > >
> > > > [0]:
> > > > ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > > DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!lockdep_hardirqs_enabled())
> > > > WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5512 check_flags+0x10a/0x1e0
> > > > Modules linked in:
> > > > CPU: 2 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 6.1.0-rc4-00160-gb56b6e2b4f31 #53
> > > > Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
> > > > epc : check_flags+0x10a/0x1e0
> > > > ra : check_flags+0x10a/0x1e0
> > > > <snip>
> > > > status: 0000000200000100 badaddr: 0000000000000000 cause: 0000000000000003
> > > > [<ffffffff808edb90>] lock_is_held_type+0x78/0x14e
> > > > [<ffffffff8003dae2>] __might_resched+0x26/0x22c
> > > > [<ffffffff8003dd24>] __might_sleep+0x3c/0x66
> > > > [<ffffffff80022c60>] get_signal+0x9e/0xa70
> > > > [<ffffffff800054a2>] do_notify_resume+0x6e/0x422
> > > > [<ffffffff80003c68>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0x10
> > > > irq event stamp: 44512
> > > > hardirqs last enabled at (44511): [<ffffffff808f901c>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x54/0x62
> > > > hardirqs last disabled at (44512): [<ffffffff80008200>] __trace_hardirqs_off+0xc/0x14
> > > > softirqs last enabled at (44472): [<ffffffff808f9fbe>] __do_softirq+0x3de/0x51e
> > > > softirqs last disabled at (44467): [<ffffffff80017760>] irq_exit+0xd6/0x104
> > > > ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> > > > possible reason: unannotated irqs-on.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > This should also theoretically be fixed by the conversion to generic entry,
> > > > but it's not clear how far away that series is from landing.
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S | 18 +++++-------------
> > > > arch/riscv/kernel/signal.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> > > > 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
> > > > index b9eda3fcbd6d..58dfa8595e19 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
> > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
> > > > @@ -263,12 +263,11 @@ ret_from_exception:
> > > > #endif
> > > > bnez s0, resume_kernel
> > > >
> > > > -resume_userspace:
> > > > /* Interrupts must be disabled here so flags are checked atomically */
> > > > REG_L s0, TASK_TI_FLAGS(tp) /* current_thread_info->flags */
> > > > andi s1, s0, _TIF_WORK_MASK
> > > > - bnez s1, work_pending
> > > > -
> > > > + bnez s1, resume_userspace_slow
> > > > +resume_userspace:
> > > > #ifdef CONFIG_CONTEXT_TRACKING_USER
> > > > call user_enter_callable
> > > > #endif
> > > > @@ -368,19 +367,12 @@ resume_kernel:
> > > > j restore_all
> > > > #endif
> > > >
> > > > -work_pending:
> > > > +resume_userspace_slow:
> > > > /* Enter slow path for supplementary processing */
> > > > - la ra, ret_from_exception
> > > > - andi s1, s0, _TIF_NEED_RESCHED
> > > > - bnez s1, work_resched
> > > > -work_notifysig:
> > > > - /* Handle pending signals and notify-resume requests */
> > > > - csrs CSR_STATUS, SR_IE /* Enable interrupts for do_notify_resume() */
> > > > move a0, sp /* pt_regs */
> > > > move a1, s0 /* current_thread_info->flags */
> > > > - tail do_notify_resume
> > > > -work_resched:
> > > > - tail schedule
> > > > + call do_work_pending
> > > > + j resume_userspace
> > > >
> > > > /* Slow paths for ptrace. */
> > > > handle_syscall_trace_enter:
> > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/signal.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/signal.c
> > > > index 5c591123c440..bfb2afa4135f 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/signal.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/signal.c
> > > > @@ -313,19 +313,27 @@ static void do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > /*
> > > > - * notification of userspace execution resumption
> > > > - * - triggered by the _TIF_WORK_MASK flags
> > > > + * Handle any pending work on the resume-to-userspace path, as indicated by
> > > > + * _TIF_WORK_MASK. Entered from assembly with IRQs off.
> > > > */
> > > > -asmlinkage __visible void do_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs,
> > > > - unsigned long thread_info_flags)
> > > > +asmlinkage __visible void do_work_pending(struct pt_regs *regs,
> > > > + unsigned long thread_info_flags)
> > > > {
> > > > - if (thread_info_flags & _TIF_UPROBE)
> > > > - uprobe_notify_resume(regs);
> > > > -
> > > > - /* Handle pending signal delivery */
> > > > - if (thread_info_flags & (_TIF_SIGPENDING | _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL))
> > > > - do_signal(regs);
> > > > -
> > > > - if (thread_info_flags & _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME)
> > > > - resume_user_mode_work(regs);
> > > > + do {
> > > > + if (thread_info_flags & _TIF_NEED_RESCHED) {
> > > > + schedule();
> > > > + } else {
> > > > + local_irq_enable();
> > > > + if (thread_info_flags & _TIF_UPROBE)
> > > > + uprobe_notify_resume(regs);
> > > > + /* Handle pending signal delivery */
> > > > + if (thread_info_flags & (_TIF_SIGPENDING |
> > > > + _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL))
> > > > + do_signal(regs);
> > > > + if (thread_info_flags & _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME)
> > > > + resume_user_mode_work(regs);
> > > > + }
> > > > + local_irq_disable();
> > > > + thread_info_flags = read_thread_flags();
> > > > + } while (thread_info_flags & _TIF_WORK_MASK);
> > > > }
> > > The more graceful code has been written in kernel/entry/common.c.
> > > Let's base it on that:
> > >
> > > static unsigned long exit_to_user_mode_loop(struct pt_regs *regs,
> > > unsigned long ti_work)
> > > {
> > > /*
> > > * Before returning to user space ensure that all pending work
> > > * items have been completed.
> > > */
> > > while (ti_work & EXIT_TO_USER_MODE_WORK) {
> > >
> > > local_irq_enable_exit_to_user(ti_work);
> > >
> > > if (ti_work & _TIF_NEED_RESCHED)
> > > schedule();
> > >
> > > if (ti_work & _TIF_UPROBE)
> > > uprobe_notify_resume(regs);
> > >
> > > if (ti_work & _TIF_PATCH_PENDING)
> > > klp_update_patch_state(current);
> > >
> > > if (ti_work & (_TIF_SIGPENDING | _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL))
> > > arch_do_signal_or_restart(regs);
> > >
> > > if (ti_work & _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME)
> > > resume_user_mode_work(regs);
> > >
> > > /* Architecture specific TIF work */
> > > arch_exit_to_user_mode_work(regs, ti_work);
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * Disable interrupts and reevaluate the work flags as they
> > > * might have changed while interrupts and preemption was
> > > * enabled above.
> > > */
> > > local_irq_disable_exit_to_user();
> > >
> > > /* Check if any of the above work has queued a
> > > deferred wakeup */
> > > tick_nohz_user_enter_prepare();
> > >
> > > ti_work = read_thread_flags();
> > > }
> > >
> > > /* Return the latest work state for arch_exit_to_user_mode() */
> > > return ti_work;
> > > }
> > >
> > > > --
> > > > 2.25.1
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best Regards
> > > Guo Ren
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-riscv mailing list
> > linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Next message: Palmer Dabbelt: "Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix unannoted hardirqs-on in return to userspace slow-path"
Previous message: Mike Kravetz: "Re: [RFC PATCH v2 02/47] hugetlb: remove mk_huge_pte; it is unused"
Next in thread: Palmer Dabbelt: "Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix unannoted hardirqs-on in return to userspace slow-path"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]