Re: [PATCH v5 7/8] media: i2c: add DS90UB913 driver

From: Laurent Pinchart
Date: Sun Dec 11 2022 - 13:33:31 EST


Hi Tomi,

Thank you for the patch.

On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 12:40:05PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> Add driver for TI DS90UB913 FPDLink-3 Serializer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/media/i2c/Kconfig | 13 +
> drivers/media/i2c/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub913.c | 892 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 906 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub913.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/Kconfig b/drivers/media/i2c/Kconfig
> index a23f723b89b5..ff5847aed5ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/Kconfig
> @@ -1614,6 +1614,19 @@ config VIDEO_DS90UB960
> Device driver for the Texas Instruments DS90UB960
> FPD-Link III Deserializer
>
> +config VIDEO_DS90UB913
> + tristate "TI DS90UB913 Serializer"
> + depends on OF && I2C && VIDEO_DEV
> + select MEDIA_CONTROLLER
> + select VIDEO_V4L2_SUBDEV_API
> + select V4L2_FWNODE
> + select REGMAP_I2C
> + select OF_GPIO
> + select I2C_ATR
> + help
> + Device driver for the Texas Instruments DS90UB913
> + FPD-Link III Serializer.
> +
> endmenu
>
> endif # VIDEO_DEV
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/Makefile b/drivers/media/i2c/Makefile
> index 2735b00437bb..376886f2ded6 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/Makefile
> @@ -143,4 +143,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_VS6624) += vs6624.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_WM8739) += wm8739.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_WM8775) += wm8775.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_DS90UB960) += ds90ub960.o
> -
> +obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_DS90UB913) += ds90ub913.o

Alphabetical order please.

> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub913.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub913.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..6001a622e622
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub913.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,892 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Driver for the Texas Instruments DS90UB913 video serializer
> + *
> + * Based on a driver from Luca Ceresoli <luca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2019 Luca Ceresoli <luca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> + * Copyright (c) 2022 Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> +#include <linux/i2c-atr.h>
> +#include <linux/i2c.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_graph.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> +
> +#include <media/i2c/ds90ub9xx.h>
> +#include <media/v4l2-subdev.h>
> +
> +#define UB913_PAD_SINK 0
> +#define UB913_PAD_SOURCE 1
> +
> +/*
> + * UB913 has 4 gpios, but gpios 3 and 4 are reserved for external oscillator
> + * mode. Thus we only support 2 gpios for now.
> + */
> +#define UB913_NUM_GPIOS 2
> +
> +#define UB913_REG_RESET_CTL 0x01
> +#define UB913_REG_RESET_CTL_DIGITAL_RESET_1 BIT(1)
> +#define UB913_REG_RESET_CTL_DIGITAL_RESET_0 BIT(0)
> +
> +#define UB913_REG_GENERAL_CFG 0x03
> +#define UB913_REG_MODE_SEL 0x05
> +
> +#define UB913_REG_CRC_ERRORS_LSB 0x0a
> +#define UB913_REG_CRC_ERRORS_MSB 0x0b
> +
> +#define UB913_REG_GENERAL_STATUS 0x0c
> +
> +#define UB913_REG_GPIO_CFG(n) (0x0d + (n))
> +#define UB913_REG_GPIO_CFG_ENABLE(n) BIT(0 + (n) * 4)
> +#define UB913_REG_GPIO_CFG_DIR_INPUT(n) BIT(1 + (n) * 4)
> +#define UB913_REG_GPIO_CFG_REMOTE_EN(n) BIT(2 + (n) * 4)
> +#define UB913_REG_GPIO_CFG_OUT_VAL(n) BIT(3 + (n) * 4)
> +#define UB913_REG_GPIO_CFG_MASK(n) (0xf << ((n) * 4))
> +
> +#define UB913_REG_SCL_HIGH_TIME 0x11
> +#define UB913_REG_SCL_LOW_TIME 0x12
> +
> +#define UB913_REG_PLL_OVR 0x35
> +
> +struct ub913_data {
> + struct i2c_client *client;
> + struct regmap *regmap;
> + struct clk *clkin;
> +
> + u32 gpio_func[UB913_NUM_GPIOS];
> +
> + struct gpio_chip gpio_chip;
> + char gpio_chip_name[64];
> +
> + struct v4l2_subdev sd;
> + struct media_pad pads[2];
> +
> + struct v4l2_async_notifier notifier;
> +
> + struct v4l2_subdev *source_sd;
> +
> + u64 enabled_source_streams;
> +
> + struct device_node *tx_ep_np;
> +
> + struct clk_hw *clkout_clk_hw;
> +
> + struct ds90ub9xx_platform_data *plat_data;
> +
> + /* Have we succefully called i2c_atr_add_adapter() */
> + bool has_i2c_adapter;
> +};
> +
> +static inline struct ub913_data *sd_to_ub913(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
> +{
> + return container_of(sd, struct ub913_data, sd);
> +}
> +
> +static int ub913_read(const struct ub913_data *priv, u8 reg, u8 *val)
> +{
> + unsigned int v;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = regmap_read(priv->regmap, reg, &v);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(&priv->client->dev,
> + "Cannot read register 0x%02x: %d!\n", reg, ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + *val = v;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ub913_write(const struct ub913_data *priv, u8 reg, u8 val)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = regmap_write(priv->regmap, reg, val);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + dev_err(&priv->client->dev,
> + "Cannot write register 0x%02x: %d!\n", reg, ret);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * GPIO chip
> + */
> +static int ub913_gpio_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
> +{
> + return GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION_OUT;
> +}
> +
> +static int ub913_gpio_direction_out(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset,
> + int value)
> +{
> + struct ub913_data *priv = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> + unsigned int reg_idx;
> + unsigned int field_idx;
> + int ret;
> +
> + reg_idx = offset / 2;
> + field_idx = offset % 2;
> +
> + ret = regmap_update_bits(
> + priv->regmap, UB913_REG_GPIO_CFG(reg_idx),
> + UB913_REG_GPIO_CFG_MASK(field_idx),
> + UB913_REG_GPIO_CFG_ENABLE(field_idx) |
> + (value ? UB913_REG_GPIO_CFG_OUT_VAL(field_idx) : 0));
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void ub913_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset, int value)
> +{
> + ub913_gpio_direction_out(gc, offset, value);
> +}
> +
> +static int ub913_gpio_of_xlate(struct gpio_chip *gc,
> + const struct of_phandle_args *gpiospec,
> + u32 *flags)
> +{
> + if (flags)
> + *flags = gpiospec->args[1];
> +
> + return gpiospec->args[0];
> +}
> +
> +static int ub913_gpiochip_probe(struct ub913_data *priv)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &priv->client->dev;
> + struct gpio_chip *gc = &priv->gpio_chip;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* Initialize GPIOs 0 and 1 to local control, tri-state */
> + ub913_write(priv, UB913_REG_GPIO_CFG(0), 0);
> +
> + scnprintf(priv->gpio_chip_name, sizeof(priv->gpio_chip_name), "%s",
> + dev_name(dev));
> +
> + gc->label = priv->gpio_chip_name;
> + gc->parent = dev;
> + gc->owner = THIS_MODULE;
> + gc->base = -1;
> + gc->can_sleep = 1;
> + gc->ngpio = UB913_NUM_GPIOS;
> + gc->get_direction = ub913_gpio_get_direction;
> + gc->direction_output = ub913_gpio_direction_out;
> + gc->set = ub913_gpio_set;
> + gc->of_xlate = ub913_gpio_of_xlate;
> + gc->of_node = priv->client->dev.of_node;
> + gc->of_gpio_n_cells = 2;
> +
> + ret = gpiochip_add_data(gc, priv);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to add GPIOs: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void ub913_gpiochip_remove(struct ub913_data *priv)
> +{
> + gpiochip_remove(&priv->gpio_chip);
> +}
> +
> +static int ub913_parse_dt(struct ub913_data *priv)

I would have moved this just before ub913_probe().

> +{
> + struct device_node *np = priv->client->dev.of_node;
> + struct device *dev = &priv->client->dev;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!np) {
> + dev_err(dev, "OF: no device tree node!\n");
> + return -ENOENT;
> + }
> +
> + /* optional, if absent all GPIO pins are unused */
> + ret = of_property_read_u32_array(np, "gpio-functions", priv->gpio_func,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(priv->gpio_func));
> + if (ret && ret != -EINVAL)
> + dev_err(dev, "DT: invalid gpio-functions property (%d)", ret);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct regmap_config ub913_regmap_config = {
> + .name = "ds90ub913",
> + .reg_bits = 8,
> + .val_bits = 8,
> + .reg_format_endian = REGMAP_ENDIAN_DEFAULT,
> + .val_format_endian = REGMAP_ENDIAN_DEFAULT,
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * V4L2
> + */
> +
> +static int ub913_enable_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> + struct v4l2_subdev_state *state, u32 pad,
> + u64 streams_mask)
> +{
> + struct ub913_data *priv = sd_to_ub913(sd);
> + struct media_pad *remote_pad;
> + u64 sink_streams;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (streams_mask & priv->enabled_source_streams)
> + return -EALREADY;
> +
> + sink_streams = v4l2_subdev_state_xlate_streams(
> + state, UB913_PAD_SOURCE, UB913_PAD_SINK, &streams_mask);
> +
> + remote_pad = media_pad_remote_pad_first(&priv->pads[UB913_PAD_SINK]);
> +
> + ret = v4l2_subdev_enable_streams(priv->source_sd, remote_pad->index,
> + sink_streams);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + priv->enabled_source_streams |= streams_mask;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ub913_disable_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> + struct v4l2_subdev_state *state, u32 pad,
> + u64 streams_mask)
> +{
> + struct ub913_data *priv = sd_to_ub913(sd);
> + struct media_pad *remote_pad;
> + int ret;
> + u64 sink_streams;
> +
> + if ((streams_mask & priv->enabled_source_streams) != streams_mask)
> + return -EALREADY;
> +
> + sink_streams = v4l2_subdev_state_xlate_streams(
> + state, UB913_PAD_SOURCE, UB913_PAD_SINK, &streams_mask);
> +
> + remote_pad = media_pad_remote_pad_first(&priv->pads[UB913_PAD_SINK]);
> +
> + ret = v4l2_subdev_disable_streams(priv->source_sd, remote_pad->index,
> + sink_streams);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + priv->enabled_source_streams &= ~streams_mask;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int _ub913_set_routing(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> + struct v4l2_subdev_state *state,
> + struct v4l2_subdev_krouting *routing)
> +{
> + const struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt format = {

static

> + .width = 640,
> + .height = 480,
> + .code = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_UYVY8_2X8,
> + .field = V4L2_FIELD_NONE,
> + .colorspace = V4L2_COLORSPACE_SRGB,
> + .ycbcr_enc = V4L2_YCBCR_ENC_601,
> + .quantization = V4L2_QUANTIZATION_LIM_RANGE,
> + .xfer_func = V4L2_XFER_FUNC_SRGB,
> + };
> + int ret;
> +
> + /*
> + * Note: we can only support up to V4L2_FRAME_DESC_ENTRY_MAX, until
> + * frame desc is made dynamically allocated.
> + */
> +
> + if (routing->num_routes > V4L2_FRAME_DESC_ENTRY_MAX)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = v4l2_subdev_routing_validate(sd, routing,
> + V4L2_SUBDEV_ROUTING_ONLY_1_TO_1);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = v4l2_subdev_set_routing_with_fmt(sd, state, routing, &format);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ub913_set_routing(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> + struct v4l2_subdev_state *state,
> + enum v4l2_subdev_format_whence which,
> + struct v4l2_subdev_krouting *routing)
> +{
> + struct ub913_data *priv = sd_to_ub913(sd);
> +
> + if (which == V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_ACTIVE && priv->enabled_source_streams)
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> + return _ub913_set_routing(sd, state, routing);
> +}
> +
> +static int ub913_get_source_frame_desc(struct ub913_data *priv,
> + struct v4l2_mbus_frame_desc *desc)
> +{
> + struct media_pad *pad;
> + int ret;
> +
> + pad = media_pad_remote_pad_first(&priv->pads[UB913_PAD_SINK]);
> + if (!pad)
> + return -EPIPE;
> +
> + ret = v4l2_subdev_call(priv->source_sd, pad, get_frame_desc, pad->index,
> + desc);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return 0;

I would inline this in the caller.

> +}
> +
> +static int ub913_get_frame_desc(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, unsigned int pad,
> + struct v4l2_mbus_frame_desc *fd)
> +{
> + struct ub913_data *priv = sd_to_ub913(sd);
> + const struct v4l2_subdev_krouting *routing;
> + struct v4l2_mbus_frame_desc source_fd;
> + struct v4l2_subdev_route *route;
> + struct v4l2_subdev_state *state;
> + int ret = 0;

No need to initialize this to 0.

> +
> + if (pad != 1) /* first tx pad */

if (pad != UB913_PAD_SOURCE)

and drop the comment.

> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = ub913_get_source_frame_desc(priv, &source_fd);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + state = v4l2_subdev_lock_and_get_active_state(sd);
> +
> + routing = &state->routing;
> +
> + memset(fd, 0, sizeof(*fd));
> +
> + fd->type = V4L2_MBUS_FRAME_DESC_TYPE_PARALLEL;
> +
> + for_each_active_route(routing, route) {
> + unsigned int j;

Anything wrong with 'i' ?

> +
> + if (route->source_pad != pad)
> + continue;
> +
> + for (j = 0; j < source_fd.num_entries; ++j)
> + if (source_fd.entry[j].stream == route->sink_stream)
> + break;
> +
> + if (j == source_fd.num_entries) {
> + dev_err(&priv->client->dev,
> + "Failed to find stream from source frame desc\n");
> + ret = -EPIPE;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + fd->entry[fd->num_entries].stream = route->source_stream;
> +
> + fd->entry[fd->num_entries].flags =
> + V4L2_MBUS_FRAME_DESC_FL_LEN_MAX;

Shouldn't this be set only if set in the source frame descriptor ?

> + fd->entry[fd->num_entries].length = source_fd.entry[j].length;
> + fd->entry[fd->num_entries].pixelcode =
> + source_fd.entry[j].pixelcode;
> +
> + fd->num_entries++;
> + }
> +
> +out:
> + v4l2_subdev_unlock_state(state);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int ub913_set_fmt(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> + struct v4l2_subdev_state *state,
> + struct v4l2_subdev_format *format)
> +{
> + struct ub913_data *priv = sd_to_ub913(sd);
> + struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt *fmt;
> +
> + if (format->which == V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_ACTIVE &&
> + priv->enabled_source_streams)
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> + /* No transcoding, source and sink formats must match. */
> + if (format->pad == 1)

if (format->pad == UB913_PAD_SOURCE)

> + return v4l2_subdev_get_fmt(sd, state, format);
> +
> + /* Set sink format */
> + fmt = v4l2_subdev_state_get_stream_format(state, format->pad,
> + format->stream);
> + if (!fmt)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + *fmt = format->format;
> +
> + /* Propagate to source format */
> + fmt = v4l2_subdev_state_get_opposite_stream_format(state, format->pad,
> + format->stream);
> + if (!fmt)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + *fmt = format->format;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ub913_init_cfg(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> + struct v4l2_subdev_state *state)
> +{
> + struct v4l2_subdev_route routes[] = {
> + {
> + .sink_pad = 0,

.sink_pad = UB913_PAD_SINK,

> + .sink_stream = 0,
> + .source_pad = 1,

.source_pad = UB913_PAD_SOURCE,

> + .source_stream = 0,
> + .flags = V4L2_SUBDEV_ROUTE_FL_ACTIVE,
> + },
> + };
> +
> + struct v4l2_subdev_krouting routing = {
> + .num_routes = ARRAY_SIZE(routes),
> + .routes = routes,
> + };
> +
> + return _ub913_set_routing(sd, state, &routing);
> +}
> +
> +static int ub913_log_status(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
> +{
> + struct ub913_data *priv = sd_to_ub913(sd);
> + struct device *dev = &priv->client->dev;
> + u8 v, v1, v2;
> +
> + ub913_read(priv, UB913_REG_MODE_SEL, &v);
> + dev_info(dev, "MODE_SEL %#x\n", v);
> +
> + ub913_read(priv, UB913_REG_CRC_ERRORS_LSB, &v1);
> + ub913_read(priv, UB913_REG_CRC_ERRORS_MSB, &v2);
> + dev_info(dev, "CRC errors %u\n", v1 | (v2 << 8));
> +
> + ub913_read(priv, UB913_REG_GENERAL_STATUS, &v);
> + dev_info(dev, "GENERAL_STATUS %#x\n", v);
> +
> + ub913_read(priv, UB913_REG_PLL_OVR, &v);
> + dev_info(dev, "PLL_OVR %#x\n", v);
> +
> + /* clear CRC errors */
> + ub913_read(priv, UB913_REG_GENERAL_CFG, &v);
> + ub913_write(priv, UB913_REG_GENERAL_CFG, v | BIT(5));
> + ub913_write(priv, UB913_REG_GENERAL_CFG, v);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct v4l2_subdev_core_ops ub913_subdev_core_ops = {
> + .log_status = ub913_log_status,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct v4l2_subdev_pad_ops ub913_pad_ops = {
> + .enable_streams = ub913_enable_streams,
> + .disable_streams = ub913_disable_streams,
> + .set_routing = ub913_set_routing,
> + .get_frame_desc = ub913_get_frame_desc,
> + .get_fmt = v4l2_subdev_get_fmt,
> + .set_fmt = ub913_set_fmt,
> + .init_cfg = ub913_init_cfg,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct v4l2_subdev_ops ub913_subdev_ops = {
> + .core = &ub913_subdev_core_ops,
> + .pad = &ub913_pad_ops,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct media_entity_operations ub913_entity_ops = {
> + .link_validate = v4l2_subdev_link_validate,
> +};
> +
> +static int ub913_notify_bound(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier,
> + struct v4l2_subdev *source_subdev,
> + struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd)
> +{
> + struct ub913_data *priv = sd_to_ub913(notifier->sd);
> + struct device *dev = &priv->client->dev;
> + unsigned int src_pad;
> + int ret;
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "Bind %s\n", source_subdev->name);

I'd drop this message.

> +
> + ret = media_entity_get_fwnode_pad(&source_subdev->entity,
> + source_subdev->fwnode,
> + MEDIA_PAD_FL_SOURCE);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to find pad for %s\n",
> + source_subdev->name);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + priv->source_sd = source_subdev;
> + src_pad = ret;
> +
> + ret = media_create_pad_link(&source_subdev->entity, src_pad,
> + &priv->sd.entity, 0,

&priv->sd.entity, UB913_PAD_SINK,

> + MEDIA_LNK_FL_ENABLED |
> + MEDIA_LNK_FL_IMMUTABLE);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Unable to link %s:%u -> %s:0\n",
> + source_subdev->name, src_pad, priv->sd.name);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "Bound %s:%u\n", source_subdev->name, src_pad);
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "All subdevs bound\n");

I'd drop this message.

> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void ub913_notify_unbind(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier,
> + struct v4l2_subdev *source_subdev,
> + struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd)
> +{
> + struct ub913_data *priv = sd_to_ub913(notifier->sd);
> + struct device *dev = &priv->client->dev;
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "Unbind %s\n", source_subdev->name);
> +}

This is a no-op so you can drop it.

> +
> +static const struct v4l2_async_notifier_operations ub913_notify_ops = {
> + .bound = ub913_notify_bound,
> + .unbind = ub913_notify_unbind,
> +};
> +
> +static int ub913_v4l2_notifier_register(struct ub913_data *priv)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &priv->client->dev;
> + struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd;
> + struct device_node *ep_node;
> + int ret;
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "register async notif\n");
> +
> + ep_node = of_graph_get_endpoint_by_regs(dev->of_node, 0, 0);
> + if (!ep_node) {
> + dev_err(dev, "No graph endpoint\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + v4l2_async_nf_init(&priv->notifier);
> +
> + asd = v4l2_async_nf_add_fwnode_remote(&priv->notifier,
> + of_fwnode_handle(ep_node),
> + struct v4l2_async_subdev);
> +
> + of_node_put(ep_node);
> +
> + if (IS_ERR(asd)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to add subdev: %ld", PTR_ERR(asd));
> + v4l2_async_nf_cleanup(&priv->notifier);
> + return PTR_ERR(asd);
> + }
> +
> + priv->notifier.ops = &ub913_notify_ops;
> +
> + ret = v4l2_async_subdev_nf_register(&priv->sd, &priv->notifier);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to register subdev_notifier");
> + v4l2_async_nf_cleanup(&priv->notifier);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void ub913_v4l2_nf_unregister(struct ub913_data *priv)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &priv->client->dev;
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "Unregister async notif\n");
> +
> + v4l2_async_nf_unregister(&priv->notifier);
> + v4l2_async_nf_cleanup(&priv->notifier);
> +}
> +
> +static int ub913_register_clkout(struct ub913_data *priv)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &priv->client->dev;
> + const char *name;
> + int ret;
> +
> + name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "ds90ub913.%s.clk_out", dev_name(dev));
> +
> + priv->clkout_clk_hw = devm_clk_hw_register_fixed_factor(dev, name,
> + __clk_get_name(priv->clkin), 0, 1, 2);
> +
> + kfree(name);
> +
> + if (IS_ERR(priv->clkout_clk_hw))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(priv->clkout_clk_hw),
> + "Cannot register clkout hw\n");
> +
> + ret = devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider(dev, of_clk_hw_simple_get,
> + priv->clkout_clk_hw);
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> + "Cannot add OF clock provider\n");
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ub913_i2c_master_init(struct ub913_data *priv)
> +{
> + /* i2c fast mode */
> + u32 scl_high = 600 + 300; /* high period + rise time, ns */
> + u32 scl_low = 1300 + 300; /* low period + fall time, ns */
> + unsigned long ref;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ref = clk_get_rate(priv->clkin) / 2;
> +
> + scl_high = div64_u64((u64)scl_high * ref, 1000000000);
> + scl_low = div64_u64((u64)scl_low * ref, 1000000000);
> +
> + ret = ub913_write(priv, UB913_REG_SCL_HIGH_TIME, scl_high);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = ub913_write(priv, UB913_REG_SCL_LOW_TIME, scl_low);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ub913_add_i2c_adapter(struct ub913_data *priv)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &priv->client->dev;
> + struct fwnode_handle *i2c_handle;
> + int ret;
> +
> + i2c_handle = device_get_named_child_node(dev, "i2c");
> + if (!i2c_handle)
> + return 0;
> +
> + ret = i2c_atr_add_adapter(priv->plat_data->atr, priv->plat_data->port,
> + i2c_handle);
> +
> + fwnode_handle_put(i2c_handle);
> +
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + priv->has_i2c_adapter = true;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void ub913_remove_i2c_adapter(struct ub913_data *priv)
> +{
> + if (priv->has_i2c_adapter)
> + i2c_atr_del_adapter(priv->plat_data->atr,
> + priv->plat_data->port);

Could i2c_atr_del_adapter() be a no-op if no adapter for the port has
been added ? You could then drop the has_i2c_adapter field. I'm also
wondering if the struct device of the DS90UB913 could be passed instead
of the port, to avoid passing the port throught
ds90ub9xx_platform_data.

> +}
> +
> +static int ub913_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &client->dev;
> + struct ub913_data *priv;
> + int ret;
> + u8 v;
> + bool mode_override;
> + u8 mode;
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "probing, addr 0x%02x\n", client->addr);
> +
> + priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!priv)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + priv->client = client;
> +
> + priv->plat_data = dev_get_platdata(&client->dev);
> + if (!priv->plat_data) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Platform data missing\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + priv->regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &ub913_regmap_config);
> + if (IS_ERR(priv->regmap)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to init regmap\n");
> + return PTR_ERR(priv->regmap);
> + }
> +
> + /* ub913 can also work without ext clock, but that is not supported */
> + priv->clkin = devm_clk_get(dev, "clkin");
> + if (IS_ERR(priv->clkin)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->clkin);
> + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + dev_err(dev, "Cannot get CLKIN (%d)", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = ub913_parse_dt(priv);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = ub913_read(priv, UB913_REG_MODE_SEL, &v);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (!(v & BIT(4))) {

Please add a mcro for this. Same for other magic bits in the driver.

> + dev_err(dev, "Mode value not stabilized\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + mode_override = v & BIT(5);
> + mode = v & 0xf;
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "mode from %s: %#x\n",
> + mode_override ? "reg" : "deserializer", mode);
> +
> + ret = ub913_i2c_master_init(priv);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "i2c master init failed: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = ub913_gpiochip_probe(priv);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to init gpiochip\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = ub913_register_clkout(priv);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to register clkout\n");
> + goto err_gpiochip_remove;
> + }
> +
> + v4l2_i2c_subdev_init(&priv->sd, priv->client, &ub913_subdev_ops);
> + priv->sd.flags |= V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_DEVNODE | V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_STREAMS;
> + priv->sd.entity.function = MEDIA_ENT_F_VID_IF_BRIDGE;
> + priv->sd.entity.ops = &ub913_entity_ops;
> +
> + priv->pads[0].flags = MEDIA_PAD_FL_SINK;
> + priv->pads[1].flags = MEDIA_PAD_FL_SOURCE;
> +
> + ret = media_entity_pads_init(&priv->sd.entity, 2, priv->pads);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to init pads\n");
> + goto err_gpiochip_remove;
> + }
> +
> + priv->tx_ep_np = of_graph_get_endpoint_by_regs(dev->of_node, 1, 0);
> + if (priv->tx_ep_np)
> + priv->sd.fwnode = of_fwnode_handle(priv->tx_ep_np);
> +
> + ret = v4l2_subdev_init_finalize(&priv->sd);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_entity_cleanup;
> +
> + ret = ub913_v4l2_notifier_register(priv);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "v4l2 subdev notifier register failed: %d\n", ret);
> + goto err_free_state;
> + }
> +
> + ret = v4l2_async_register_subdev(&priv->sd);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "v4l2_async_register_subdev error: %d\n", ret);
> + goto err_unreg_notif;
> + }
> +
> + ret = ub913_add_i2c_adapter(priv);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to add remote i2c adapter\n");
> + goto err_unreg_async_subdev;
> + }
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "Successfully probed\n");
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_unreg_async_subdev:
> + v4l2_async_unregister_subdev(&priv->sd);
> +err_unreg_notif:
> + ub913_v4l2_nf_unregister(priv);
> +err_free_state:
> + v4l2_subdev_cleanup(&priv->sd);
> +err_entity_cleanup:
> + if (priv->tx_ep_np)
> + of_node_put(priv->tx_ep_np);
> +
> + media_entity_cleanup(&priv->sd.entity);
> +err_gpiochip_remove:
> + ub913_gpiochip_remove(priv);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void ub913_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> + struct v4l2_subdev *sd = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> + struct ub913_data *priv = sd_to_ub913(sd);
> +
> + dev_dbg(&client->dev, "Removing\n");
> +
> + ub913_remove_i2c_adapter(priv);
> +
> + v4l2_async_unregister_subdev(&priv->sd);
> +
> + ub913_v4l2_nf_unregister(priv);
> +
> + v4l2_subdev_cleanup(&priv->sd);
> +
> + if (priv->tx_ep_np)
> + of_node_put(priv->tx_ep_np);
> +
> + media_entity_cleanup(&priv->sd.entity);
> +
> + ub913_gpiochip_remove(priv);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct i2c_device_id ub913_id[] = { { "ds90ub913a-q1", 0 }, {} };
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, ub913_id);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +static const struct of_device_id ub913_dt_ids[] = {
> + { .compatible = "ti,ds90ub913a-q1", },
> + {}
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ub913_dt_ids);
> +#endif
> +
> +static struct i2c_driver ds90ub913_driver = {
> + .probe_new = ub913_probe,
> + .remove = ub913_remove,
> + .id_table = ub913_id,
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "ds90ub913a",
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(ub913_dt_ids),
> + },
> +};
> +
> +module_i2c_driver(ds90ub913_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Texas Instruments DS90UB913 serializer driver");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Luca Ceresoli <luca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>");
> --
> 2.34.1
>

--
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart