[PATCH -next v2 4/4] fault-injection: make stacktrace filter works as expected

From: Wang Yufen
Date: Sun Dec 11 2022 - 21:11:58 EST


From: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@xxxxxxxxxx>

stacktrace filter is checked after others, such as fail-nth,
interval and probability. This make it doesn't work well as
expected.

Fix to running stacktrace filter before other filters. It will
speed up fault inject testing for driver modules.

Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
lib/fault-inject.c | 12 +++++++++---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/fault-inject.c b/lib/fault-inject.c
index d7819ca..6cff320 100644
--- a/lib/fault-inject.c
+++ b/lib/fault-inject.c
@@ -102,10 +102,16 @@ static inline bool fail_stacktrace(struct fault_attr *attr)

bool should_fail_ex(struct fault_attr *attr, ssize_t size, int flags)
{
+ bool stack_checked = false;
+
if (in_task()) {
unsigned int fail_nth = READ_ONCE(current->fail_nth);

if (fail_nth) {
+ if (!fail_stacktrace(attr))
+ return false;
+
+ stack_checked = true;
fail_nth--;
WRITE_ONCE(current->fail_nth, fail_nth);
if (!fail_nth)
@@ -125,6 +131,9 @@ bool should_fail_ex(struct fault_attr *attr, ssize_t size, int flags)
if (atomic_read(&attr->times) == 0)
return false;

+ if (!stack_checked && !fail_stacktrace(attr))
+ return false;
+
if (atomic_read(&attr->space) > size) {
atomic_sub(size, &attr->space);
return false;
@@ -139,9 +148,6 @@ bool should_fail_ex(struct fault_attr *attr, ssize_t size, int flags)
if (attr->probability <= get_random_u32_below(100))
return false;

- if (!fail_stacktrace(attr))
- return false;
-
fail:
if (!(flags & FAULT_NOWARN))
fail_dump(attr);
--
1.8.3.1