Re: [PATCH] 9p/virtio: add a read barrier in p9_virtio_zc_request

From: Dominique Martinet
Date: Mon Dec 12 2022 - 23:04:46 EST


Christian Schoenebeck wrote on Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 02:35:39PM +0100:
> > diff --git a/net/9p/trans_virtio.c b/net/9p/trans_virtio.c
> > index 3c27ffb781e3..98425c63b3c3 100644
> > --- a/net/9p/trans_virtio.c
> > +++ b/net/9p/trans_virtio.c
> > @@ -533,6 +533,12 @@ p9_virtio_zc_request(struct p9_client *client, struct p9_req_t *req,
> > p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_TRANS, "virtio request kicked\n");
> > err = wait_event_killable(req->wq,
> > READ_ONCE(req->status) >= REQ_STATUS_RCVD);
> > +
> > + /* Make sure our req is coherent with regard to updates in other
> > + * threads - echoes to wmb() in the callback like p9_client_rpc
> > + */
> > + smp_rmb();
> > +
>
> Oh, I had p9_client_zc_rpc() for this in mind, but I see why you chose this
> place in p9_virtio_zc_request() instead. LGTM

Yes, we access req data here so as much as it'd make more sense to keep
it symetrical in p9_client_zc_rpc (like p9_client_rpc) I think we need
it here.

> I also made some tests to check whether this barrier would hurt performance,
> but I measured no difference. So this should be good to go:

Thanks!
The assembly generated with the barrier is actually slightly shorter for
x86_64, but it's hard to tell the actual performance impact....

> Reviewed-by: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Cheers, I've queued this patch as well: let's make that this merge
windows' batch unless a problem comes up.

--
Dominique