Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf stat: fix unexpected delay behaviour

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

Em Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 08:40:31AM -0800, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 6:44 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> <acme@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Em Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 09:20:37AM +0100, James Clark escreveu:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 29/07/2022 17:12, Adrián Herrera Arcila wrote:
> > > > The described --delay behaviour is to delay the enablement of events, but
> > > > not the execution of the command, if one is passed, which is incorrectly
> > > > the current behaviour.
> > > >
> > > > This patch decouples the enablement from the delay, and enables events
> > > > before or after launching the workload dependent on the options passed
> > > > by the user. This code structure is inspired by that in perf-record, and
> > > > tries to be consistent with it.
> > > >
> > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/7BFD066E-B0A8-49D4-B635-379328F0CF4C@xxxxxx
> > > > Fixes: d0a0a511493d ("perf stat: Fix forked applications enablement of counters")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Adrián Herrera Arcila <adrian.herrera@xxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >  tools/perf/builtin-stat.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > > >  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > Looks good to me. Fixes the counter delay issue and the code is pretty
> > > similar to perf record now. Although I would wait for Leo's or Song's
> > > comment as well because they were involved.
> >
> > I think I didn't notice Leo's ack, it still applies, so I'm doing it
> > now.
> 
> I think the BPF counters should be enabled/disabled together.

Ok, so I removed this one and applied Namhyung's.

- Arnaldo