Re: [PATCH 0/4] thermal: fix locking regressions in linux-next

[Johan Hovold]

On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 03:37:43PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 14/12/2022 15:02, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 2:18 PM Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> This series fixes some of the fallout after the thermal changes that
> >> just landed in linux-next.
> >>
> >> Lockdep reported a lock inversion in one of the Qualcomm drivers and a
> >> closer review revealed that the changes had also broken the sysfs
> >> interface for at least three drivers.

> > It is still present in my bleeding-edge branch, though, so please
> > apply the patches from Johan on top of it and send a new PR to me, so
> > I can add it back to my linux-next branch once 6.2-rc1 appears.
> > 
> > It would be good to check the code again too for any more similar fallout.
> 
> I've been through already, the exynos fix is not necessary.

Right, I failed to notice that tmu_set_trip_temp() was not actually a
thermal_zone_device_ops callback. So that one can be dropped.

Johan