Re: [PATCH] [next] pcmcia: synclink_cs: replace 1-element array with flex-array member

From: Paulo Miguel Almeida
Date: Thu Dec 15 2022 - 01:36:04 EST


On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 05:29:15PM +1300, Paulo Miguel Almeida wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 12:06:46AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 11:49 PM Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 10:39:52PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > Yes, and Try to make it work with __packed. As I said, the problem is
> > > > that the code is relying on something which is architecture dependent
> > > > strictly speaking. And hence I disagree with Kees that v2 is okay to
> > > > go.
> > >
> > > I meant that v2 is functionally identical to the existing code.
> >
> > Ah, sorry for misunderstanding.
> >
>
> I agree with using __packed attribute to remove the extra padding (and
> for the reasons you mentioned before). That would reduce the sizeof(RXBUF)
> from 8 to 5 (which is good) but that is still 1 byte "too much".
>
> Piggying back on a suggestion Kees gave before:
>
> - info->rx_buf_size = sizeof(RXBUF) + info->max_frame_size;
> + info->rx_buf_size = sizeof(RXBUF) - 1 + info->max_frame_size;
>
> That way RXBUF->data will point to the first byte of the frame_size
> (MGSLPC_INFO->max_frame_size) which is what is actually needed.
>

I chose my words poorly here... sorry my brain is a bit fried today.

Let me rephrase that last sentence. After that change (or similar
change), RXBUF->data will point to the first byte of the buffer
allocated during the initialisation process. (which is
limited/controlled by the size of MGSLPC_INFO->max_frame_size)...
so no 'extra byte/padding' will be there.

- Paulo A.

> > > > The full change should be something like
> > > >
> > > > check_add(sizeof(), max_frame_size)
> > > > kcalloc(8, size)
> > >
> > > Right -- this would fix the existing mistakes in size calculation (and
> > > is certainly better).
> >
> > Glad to hear that we are on the same page.
> >
>
> That makes sense to me.
>
> thanks!
>
> - Paulo A.