On 28/12/2022 12:37, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
On 28.12.2022 12:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
The GCC bindings expect core_bi_pll_test_se clock input, even if it isIs it even going to be used by anybody, or should we just drop
optional:
sm8350-mtp.dtb: clock-controller@100000: clock-names:2: 'core_bi_pll_test_se' was expected
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
it on the driver side as per usual?
It's mentioned as possible parent, so there might be users somewhere...
Or you want to say that other binding and DTS users cannot use that clock?
Best regards,
Krzysztof