Re: [PATCH] [v2] mtd: cfi: allow building spi-intel standalone

[Miquel Raynal]

Hi Tudor,

tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxx wrote on Mon, 26 Dec 2022 16:22:02 +0200:

> On 21.12.2022 08:49, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 20.12.2022 17:57, Miquel Raynal wrote:  
> >> Hi Tudor,
> >>  
> > 
> > Hi,
> >   
> >> tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxx wrote on Tue, 20 Dec 2022 17:44:49 +0200:
> >>  
> >>> Hi, Arnd,
> >>>
> >>> On 20.12.2022 16:13, Arnd Bergmann wrote:  
> >>>> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> >>>>
> >>>> When MTD or MTD_CFI_GEOMETRY is disabled, the spi-intel driver
> >>>> fails to build, as it includes the shared CFI header:
> >>>>
> >>>> include/linux/mtd/cfi.h:62:2: error: #warning No CONFIG_MTD_CFI_Ix >>>> selected. No NOR chip support can work. [-Werror=cpp]
> >>>>      62 | #warning No CONFIG_MTD_CFI_Ix selected. No NOR chip >>>> support can work.
> >>>>
> >>>> linux/mtd/spi-nor.h does not actually need to include cfi.h, so
> >>>> remove the inclusion here to fix the warning. This uncovers a
> >>>> missing #include in spi-nor/core.c so add that there to
> >>>> prevent a different build issue.
> >>>>
> >>>> Fixes: e23e5a05d1fd ("mtd: spi-nor: intel-spi: Convert to SPI MEM")
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>  
> >>>
> >>> Looks good to me. I'll let the linux-0day bot run over it and apply it
> >>> once -rc1 is out.  
> >>
> >> The issue sometimes produces build errors, shall I send it through a
> >> fixes PR instead?
> >>  
> > 
> > Yes, that I was thinking about.
> >   
> 
> Seems that I shouldn't push to mtd/fixes, so:
> Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxx>

Oh yes you can, sorry for the misunderstanding, but as I am often alone
to do it, I read your "I will apply" message last time and understood "I
will apply on spi-nor/next". 

You can update mtd/fixes to -rc1 and push the patch, as long as we keep
each other in sync ;)

Thanks!
Miquèl