Re: [RFC PATCH] media: v4l2-dev: sysfs: Support streaming attribute

[Laurent Pinchart]

Hello,

On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 01:14:15PM +0000, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 01:44:38AM +0000, Barnabás Pőcze wrote:
> > On 2022. december 26., hétfő 10:52, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 11:17:35PM +0000, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Provide a streaming attribute to allow userspace to interogate if a device
> > > > is actively streaming or not.
> > > > 
> > > > This will allow desktop notifications to report if a camera or device
> > > > is active on the system, rather than just 'open' which can occur when
> > > > configuring the device.
> > > > 
> > > > Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pipewire/pipewire/-/issues/2669
> > > > Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham kieran.bingham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > ---
> > > > 
> > > > This is a quick POC to see if such a facility makes sense.
> > > > I'm weary that not all video devices may have the queues registered on
> > > > the struct video_device, but this seems like an effective way to be able
> > > > to determine if a device is actively streaming on a system.
> > > 
> > > I can imagine multiple problems, from race conditions to permissions and
> > > privacy. In order to comment on the fitness of this solution to address
> > > the problem you're trying to solve, could you describe the actual
> > > problem ?
> > 
> > The issue is explained in the following thread:
> > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pipewire/pipewire/-/issues/2669#note_1697388
> > 
> > In short, the user wants to show a "camera-in-use" indicator when the laptop camera
> > is used. The script that the user previously had only checked if /dev/video0
> > was open in any process, if it was, the indicator was shown. However, libcamera
> > - at least at the moment - keeps the file descriptor open as long as the Camera
> > object exists, which pipewire keeps alive for the entire lifetime of the device,
> > therefore the "camera-in-use" indicator is always shown.
> 
> A sysfs attribute is not a great way to address this.
> 
> libcamera certainly has information on whether streaming is ongoing. The
> information should come from there. Or Pipewire. Dbus perhaps?

I tend to agree, I think this is best solved in userspace where PipeWire
can have a centralized view of all cameras in the system, and of their
users.

> Alternatively libcamera could close the video devices while not streaming
> but that would involve e.g. releasing possible video buffer allocations as
> well, increasing streaming start latency.

Closing video (and subdev) nodes when the camera is not in use would be
good I think. It doesn't mean we have to open them when starting
capture, explicit open/close operation (or similar, maybe introducing a
capture session object in the libcamera API would also make sense, it
should be considered as part of the same issue) could help with this.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart