Re: [PATCH v5 00/21] nvmem: core: introduce NVMEM layouts

[Srinivas Kandagatla]

Hi Miquel,

On 03/01/2023 15:39, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Srinivas,
>
> michael@xxxxxxxx wrote on Tue,  6 Dec 2022 21:07:19 +0100:
>
> > This is now the third attempt to fetch the MAC addresses from the VPD
> > for the Kontron sl28 boards. Previous discussions can be found here:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211228142549.1275412-1-michael@xxxxxxxx/
> >
> >
> > NVMEM cells are typically added by board code or by the devicetree. But
> > as the cells get more complex, there is (valid) push back from the
> > devicetree maintainers to not put that handling in the devicetree.
> >
> > Therefore, introduce NVMEM layouts. They operate on the NVMEM device and
> > can add cells during runtime. That way it is possible to add more complex
> > cells than it is possible right now with the offset/length/bits
> > description in the device tree. For example, you can have post processing
> > for individual cells (think of endian swapping, or ethernet offset
> > handling).
> >
> > The imx-ocotp driver is the only user of the global post processing hook,
> > convert it to nvmem layouts and drop the global post pocessing hook.
> >
> > For now, the layouts are selected by the device tree. But the idea is
> > that also board files or other drivers could set a layout. Although no
> > code for that exists yet.
> >
> > Thanks to Miquel, the device tree bindings are already approved and merged.
> >
> > NVMEM layouts as modules?
> > While possible in principle, it doesn't make any sense because the NVMEM
> > core can't be compiled as a module. The layouts needs to be available at
> > probe time. (That is also the reason why they get registered with
> > subsys_initcall().) So if the NVMEM core would be a module, the layouts
> > could be modules, too.
>
> I believe this series still applies even though -rc1 (and -rc2) are out
> now, may we know if you consider merging it anytime soon or if there
> are still discrepancies in the implementation you would like to
> discuss? Otherwise I would really like to see this laying in -next a
> few weeks before being sent out to Linus, just in case.

Thanks for the work!

Lets get some testing in -next.


Applied now,





--srini
> Thanks,
> Miquèl