Re: [PATCH] clk: microchip: mpfs-ccc: Use devm_kasprintf() for allocating formatted strings
From: Conor Dooley
Date: Wed Jan 04 2023 - 08:40:34 EST
On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 02:26:53PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Conor,
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 6:32 PM Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I half wonder if this should actually have a fixes tag too. Since it
> > used what came after the @ in $full_name, it'd be possible to create
> > (an incorrect) DTS that would lead to a clash between pll names &
> > therefore probe would fail.
> > The tag would be:
> > Fixes: d39fb172760e ("clk: microchip: add PolarFire SoC fabric clock support")
>
> But I don't change any of that in my patch?
> /me confused.
The numbers in there were chosen to fit exactly what is in mpfs.dtsi
(IOW the correct node address), so doing
@@ -201,14 +200,13 @@ static int mpfs_ccc_register_plls(struct device *dev, struct mpfs_ccc_pll_hw_clo
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < num_clks; i++) {
struct mpfs_ccc_pll_hw_clock *pll_hw = &pll_hws[i];
- char *name = devm_kzalloc(dev, 18, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!name)
+ pll_hw->name = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "ccc%s_pll%u",
+ strchrnul(dev->of_node->full_name, '@'), i);
+ if (!pll_hw->name)
return -ENOMEM;
pll_hw->base = data->pll_base[i];
- snprintf(name, 18, "ccc%s_pll%u", strchrnul(dev->of_node->full_name, '@'), i);
- pll_hw->name = (const char *)name;
pll_hw->hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_PARENTS_DATA_FIXED_SIZE(pll_hw->name,
pll_hw->parents,
&mpfs_ccc_pll_ops, 0);
means that we no longer have to worry that someone would provide a
device tree with a node address that would make "ccc<node_address>_pll<N>"
exceed 18 characters. If that happened, the <N> would be cut off & both
pll 0 & 1 would be named identically. If that happens, pll1 would fail
to register.
Or am I misunderstanding something? Probably am..
Thanks,
Conor.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature