Re: [PATCH] blk-iocost: don't make all constants unsigned long long

[Tejun Heo]

On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 09:18:19PM +0100, Yann Droneaud wrote:
> My shiny new compiler (GCC 13) is reporting the following
> warnings:
> 
>   ../block/blk-iocost.c: In function 'ioc_weight_prfill':
>   ../block/blk-iocost.c:3035:37: warning: format '%u' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'long unsigned int' [-Wformat=]
>    3035 |                 seq_printf(sf, "%s %u\n", dname, iocg->cfg_weight / WEIGHT_ONE);
>         |                                    ~^            ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>         |                                     |                             |
>         |                                     unsigned int                  long unsigned int
>         |                                    %lu
>   ../block/blk-iocost.c: In function 'ioc_weight_show':
>   ../block/blk-iocost.c:3045:34: warning: format '%u' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'long unsigned int' [-Wformat=]
>    3045 |         seq_printf(sf, "default %u\n", iocc->dfl_weight / WEIGHT_ONE);
>         |                                 ~^     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>         |                                  |                      |
>         |                                  unsigned int           long unsigned int
>         |                                 %lu
> 
> It appears WEIGHT_ONE enum is unnecessarly unsigned long
> (or unsigned long long on 32bit) because of VTIME_PER_SEC
> and/or AUTOP_CYCLE_NSEC need the enum to be that large.
> 
> Addressed by lazy splitting the "catch all" anonymous
> enum and placing the unsigned long long constants in
> their own anonymous enums.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@xxxxxxxxxx>

There's a better patch doing this which groups the enums into two groups.
Let's do that instead.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun