[PATCH rcu 02/15] doc: Update NMI-RCU.rst

[Paul E. McKenney]

This commit updates NMI-RCU.rst to highlight the ancient heritage of
the example code and to discourage wanton compiler "optimizations".

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 Documentation/RCU/NMI-RCU.rst | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/NMI-RCU.rst b/Documentation/RCU/NMI-RCU.rst
index 2a92bc685ef1a..dff60a80b386e 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/NMI-RCU.rst
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/NMI-RCU.rst
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Although RCU is usually used to protect read-mostly data structures,
 it is possible to use RCU to provide dynamic non-maskable interrupt
 handlers, as well as dynamic irq handlers.  This document describes
 how to do this, drawing loosely from Zwane Mwaikambo's NMI-timer
-work in "arch/x86/kernel/traps.c".
+work in an old version of "arch/x86/kernel/traps.c".
 
 The relevant pieces of code are listed below, each followed by a
 brief explanation::
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ Answer to Quick Quiz:
 
 	This same sad story can happen on other CPUs when using
 	a compiler with aggressive pointer-value speculation
-	optimizations.
+	optimizations.  (But please don't!)
 
 	More important, the rcu_dereference_sched() makes it
 	clear to someone reading the code that the pointer is
-- 
2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23