RE: [PATCH 2/4] rtw88: Configure the registers from rtw_bf_assoc() outside the RCU lock

[Ping-Ke Shih]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2023 11:44 PM
> To: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kvalo@xxxxxxxxxx; s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; tony0620emma@xxxxxxxxx;
> netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] rtw88: Configure the registers from rtw_bf_assoc() outside the RCU lock
> 
> Hi Ping-Ke,
> 
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 12:48 AM Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [...]
> > > Reviewed-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > I think my reviewed-by should behind your signed-off-by.
> My understanding is that I have to put your Reviewed-by above my
> Signed-off-by since I added the Reviewed-by to the description.
> If the maintainer adds your Reviewed-by while applying the patch to
> the tree they will put your Reviewed-by between my Signed-off-by and
> the maintainer's Signed-off-by.
> 
> If this is incorrect then please let me know and I'll change it for v3.
> 

My original thought is to add my reviewed-by in the order like maintainer
applies the patch, but your understanding looks reasonable. Sorry for the noise.

Ping-Ke