Re: [PATCH linux-next v2] s390/zcrypt: use strscpy() to instead of strncpy()

[Bagas Sanjaya]

On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 10:51:21AM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 10:02:07AM +0800, yang.yang29@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Yang Yang <yang.yang29@xxxxxxx>
> > 
> > The implementation of strscpy() is more robust and safer.
> > That's now the recommended way to copy NUL-terminated strings.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Yang Yang <yang.yang29@xxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Xu Panda <xu.panda@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > chang for v2
> >  - match the FROM with the Email
> 
> You sent this from yang.yang29@xxxxxxxxxx, but the sign-off is without the
> ".cn" suffix. Can you please make sure that your sign-off chain actually
> follows the rules as outlined in Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?
> 
> If you read that then the sign-off line from Xu Panda shouldn't be there,
> since the patch was not authored or routed via Xu Panda.

Specifically, the second SoB from Xu should only be included if he was
in From: mail header (that is, he should have sent the patch instead of
Yang).

Ah! Thanks for reminding me of this trivial issue that I always missed
when reviewing ZTE patches.

Xu, are you really transporting Yang's patch?

Thanks.

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature