Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/6] net: ipa: simplify IPA interrupt handling

[patchwork-bot+netdevbpf]

Hello:

This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (master)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>:

On Wed,  4 Jan 2023 11:52:27 -0600 you wrote:
> One of the IPA's two IRQs fires when data on a suspended channel is
> available (to request that the channel--or system--be resumed to
> recieve the pending data).  This interrupt also handles a few
> conditions signaled by the embedded microcontroller.
> 
> For this "IPA interrupt", the current code requires a handler to be
> dynamically registered for each interrupt condition.  Any condition
> that has no registered handler is quietly ignored.  This design is
> derived from the downstream IPA driver implementation.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net-next,v2,1/6] net: ipa: introduce a common microcontroller interrupt handler
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/e5709b7c1ede
  - [net-next,v2,2/6] net: ipa: introduce ipa_interrupt_enable()
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/8e461e1f092b
  - [net-next,v2,3/6] net: ipa: enable IPA interrupt handlers separate from registration
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/d50ed3558719
  - [net-next,v2,4/6] net: ipa: register IPA interrupt handlers directly
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/482ae3a993e4
  - [net-next,v2,5/6] net: ipa: kill ipa_interrupt_add()
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/8d8d3f1a3ef9
  - [net-next,v2,6/6] net: ipa: don't maintain IPA interrupt handler array
    (no matching commit)

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html