Re: [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: usb: Correct and extend FOTG210 schema

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 04/01/2023 00:35, Linus Walleij wrote:
> It turns out that this IP block exists in at least two
> incarnations: FOTG200 and FOTG210. The one in the Gemini
> is FOTG200, so add the variants and rectify the binding
> for Gemini.
> 
> This affects things such as the placement of certain
> registers.
> 
> It remains to be seen how similar this block is to the
> third USB block from Faraday, FUSB220.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/faraday,fotg210.yaml | 7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/faraday,fotg210.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/faraday,fotg210.yaml
> index 84b3b69256b1..12d4fc742f20 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/faraday,fotg210.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/faraday,fotg210.yaml
> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
>  $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/usb/faraday,fotg210.yaml#
>  $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>  
> -title: Faraday Technology FOTG210 HS OTG USB 2.0 controller
> +title: Faraday Technology FOTG200 series HS OTG USB 2.0 controller Bindings

That's not correct change, probably due to rebasing. Change the name
only, do not add "Bindings".


Best regards,
Krzysztof