Re: [PATCH V7 2/2] firmware: qcom: scm: Add wait-queue handling logic
From: Srinivas Kandagatla
Date: Tue Jan 10 2023 - 07:17:35 EST
Hi Sibi,
Few minor comments below,
On 10/01/2023 06:37, Sibi Sankar wrote:
From: Guru Das Srinagesh <quic_gurus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
When the firmware (FW) supports multiple requests per VM, multiple requests
from the same/different VM can reach the firmware at the same time. Since
the firmware currently being used has limited resources, it guards them
with a resource lock and puts requests on a wait-queue internally and
signals to HLOS that it is doing so. It does this by returning a new return
value in addition to success or error: SCM_WAITQ_SLEEP. A sleeping SCM call
can be woken up by an interrupt that the FW raises.
...
drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-smc.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.h | 8 +++
3 files changed, 179 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-smc.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-smc.c
index d111833364ba..30999f04749c 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-smc.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-smc.c
...
+static int __scm_smc_do_quirk_handle_waitq(struct device *dev, struct arm_smccc_args *waitq,
+ struct arm_smccc_res *res)
+{
+ int ret;
+ struct arm_smccc_args resume;
+ u32 wq_ctx, smc_call_ctx, flags;
+ struct arm_smccc_args *smc = waitq;
+
+ do {
+ __scm_smc_do_quirk(smc, res);
+
+ if (res->a0 == QCOM_SCM_WAITQ_SLEEP) {
+ wq_ctx = res->a1;
+ smc_call_ctx = res->a2;
+ flags = res->a3;
+
+ if (!dev)
+ return -EPROBE_DEFER;
why are we checking dev pointer in the middle of the call?
A comment here would really help readers.
+
+ ret = qcom_scm_lookup_completion(wq_ctx);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ fill_wq_resume_args(&resume, smc_call_ctx);
+ smc = &resume;
+ }
+ } while (res->a0 == QCOM_SCM_WAITQ_SLEEP);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
...
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
index cdbfe54c8146..19ac506a9b1f 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
*/
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
@@ -13,6 +14,7 @@
#include <linux/qcom_scm.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/of_address.h>
+#include <linux/of_irq.h>
#include <linux/of_platform.h>
#include <linux/clk.h>
#include <linux/reset-controller.h>
include <linux/completion.h> ??
@@ -33,6 +35,7 @@ struct qcom_scm {
struct clk *iface_clk;
struct clk *bus_clk;
struct icc_path *path;
+ struct completion waitq_comp;
struct reset_controller_dev reset;
/* control access to the interconnect path */
@@ -63,6 +66,9 @@ static const u8 qcom_scm_cpu_warm_bits[QCOM_SCM_BOOT_MAX_CPUS] = {
BIT(2), BIT(1), BIT(4), BIT(6)
};
+#define QCOM_SMC_WAITQ_FLAG_WAKE_ONE BIT(0)
+#define QCOM_SMC_WAITQ_FLAG_WAKE_ALL BIT(1)
+
static const char * const qcom_scm_convention_names[] = {
[SMC_CONVENTION_UNKNOWN] = "unknown",
[SMC_CONVENTION_ARM_32] = "smc arm 32",
@@ -1325,11 +1331,79 @@ bool qcom_scm_is_available(void)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_scm_is_available);
+static struct completion *qcom_scm_lookup_wq(struct qcom_scm *scm, u32 wq_ctx)
+{
+ /* assert wq_ctx is zero */ > + if (wq_ctx != 0) {
Is this correct? looks like zero is the only valid one.
I thought wq_ctx was a unique number (UID).
+ dev_err(scm->dev, "No waitqueue found for wq_ctx %d\n", wq_ctx);
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+ }
+
+ return &scm->waitq_comp;
+}
+
+int qcom_scm_lookup_completion(u32 wq_ctx)
+{
+ struct completion *wq = NULL;
+
+ wq = qcom_scm_lookup_wq(__scm, wq_ctx);
+ if (IS_ERR(wq))
+ return PTR_ERR(wq);
+
+ wait_for_completion(wq);
We can potentially block here forever without a timeout.
As you are reusing completion, I have not seen any reinitialization of
completion, this could potentially return above line without waiting at all.
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int qcom_scm_waitq_wakeup(struct qcom_scm *scm, unsigned int wq_ctx, bool wake_all)
+{
+ struct completion *wq_to_wake;
+
+ wq_to_wake = qcom_scm_lookup_wq(scm, wq_ctx);
+ if (IS_ERR(wq_to_wake))
+ return PTR_ERR(wq_to_wake);
+
+ if (wake_all)
+ complete_all(wq_to_wake);
+ else
+ complete(wq_to_wake);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t qcom_scm_irq_handler(int irq, void *data)
+{
+ int ret;
+ struct qcom_scm *scm = data;
+ u32 wq_ctx, flags, more_pending = 0;
+
+ do {
+ ret = scm_get_wq_ctx(&wq_ctx, &flags, &more_pending);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(scm->dev, "GET_WQ_CTX SMC call failed: %d\n", ret);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ if (flags != QCOM_SMC_WAITQ_FLAG_WAKE_ONE &&
+ flags != QCOM_SMC_WAITQ_FLAG_WAKE_ALL) {
+ dev_err(scm->dev, "Invalid flags found for wq_ctx: %u\n", flags);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ ret = qcom_scm_waitq_wakeup(scm, wq_ctx, !!(flags & QCOM_SMC_WAITQ_FLAG_WAKE_ALL));
+ if (ret)
+ goto out;
+ } while (more_pending);
+
+out:
+ return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
static int qcom_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct qcom_scm *scm;
unsigned long clks;
- int ret;
+ int irq, ret;
scm = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*scm), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!scm)
@@ -1402,6 +1476,19 @@ static int qcom_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
__scm = scm;
__scm->dev = &pdev->dev;
+ init_completion(&__scm->waitq_comp);
+
+ irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
+ if (irq < 0) {
+ if (irq != -ENXIO)
+ return irq;
+ } else {
+ ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(__scm->dev, irq, NULL, qcom_scm_irq_handler,
+ IRQF_ONESHOT, "qcom-scm", __scm);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return dev_err_probe(scm->dev, ret, "Failed to request qcom-scm irq\n");
+ }
+
__get_convention();
/*
--srini